RE: RE:ATM int are up, unable to ping. [7:5934]

2001-05-30 Thread Deloso, Elmer G (WPNSTA Yorktown)
01 5:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE:ATM int are up, unable to ping. [7:5934] ok, couldn't let this pass on a Friday afternoon. Went to the lab and set up 2 routers as beginning on page 283, Lab #17. No, it didn't work. I was using a 3600 and a 4700. I dropped the 3600 an

Re: RE:ATM int are up, unable to ping. [7:5934]

2001-05-25 Thread Kevin Wigle
ok, couldn't let this pass on a Friday afternoon. Went to the lab and set up 2 routers as beginning on page 283, Lab #17. No, it didn't work. I was using a 3600 and a 4700. I dropped the 3600 and used another 4700. Didn't work. However I noticed that when back-to-back both 4700's Rcv Alarm was

Re: RE:ATM int are up, unable to ping. [7:5934]

2001-05-25 Thread Kevin Wigle
My understanding is that "in the past", it was common to use map-lists. However the "preferred" way now is to use sub-interfaces. I had map-lists throughout our large corporate lab just 6 months ago and then converted them all to subs. So, I don't think it's a matter of correctness, just a matt