RIP v1 can optionally support host routes ( /32 ) according to the RFC
(ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1058.txt ) this is an optional
implementation. Cisco has chosen to support host routes, if my own
experiments are accurate. You might want to try a couple of scenarios to
verify.
One more
Doug Lockwood wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Just a thought. Are you really running rip V1 or are you running Rip V2
in
compatibly mode.
The first config would look like:
Router Rip
Net 172.10.0.0
The second would look like:
Router rip
version 1
net
The /32 Subnet Mask in your Show IP Route, is OSPF earmarking the loopbacks.
I believe it's 12.1 where this goes away, though I do not know what the
advantage would be.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Seven
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 6:27 PM
Subject: RIPv1: why /32 route is
Just a thought. Are you really running rip V1 or are you running Rip V2 in
compatibly mode.
The first config would look like:
Router Rip
Net 172.10.0.0
The second would look like:
Router rip
version 1
net 172.10.0.0
Just a thought.
Doug
Message Posted at:
Are you running ppp and getting a peer neighbor-route of the IP on the
other end... This can be turned off by no peer neighbor-route on the
interface, and having ppp re-negotiate.
Thanks
-Nate
Jerry Seven wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi Group,
In this simple
address, sounds like
a IOS change in 12.X.
Thanks,
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: Circusnuts
To: Jerry Seven ;
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: RIPv1: why /32 route is distributed [7:7010]
The /32 Subnet Mask in your Show IP Route, is OSPF earmarking the
loopbacks.
I
6 matches
Mail list logo
