RE: Securing a Aironet 350 [7:44152]

2002-05-14 Thread Tim O'Brien
Have a look at the following paper. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/cuso/epso/sqfr/safwl_wp.htm Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Securing a Aironet 350 [7:44152]

2002-05-14 Thread C restion
Hi Rich, First thing to do is to trace the signal. I.e. what are the physical limits of the RF. Special wireless tools (like the Sniffer Wireless) are available to help you with this, but the software delivered with your Aironet can tell you a lot as well. If the signal stays within the

Re: Securing a Aironet 350 [7:44152]

2002-05-14 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I don't usually contradict what somene says but when they're way off, I need to. First off; WEP IS UNSECURE! It dosen't matter if it's 64 or 128 bit, they ar both just as easy to hack (air snort). Second, MAC address security isn't secure, as you can spoof them. Third, even if you can't pick

Re: Securing a Aironet 350 [7:44152]

2002-05-14 Thread C restion
Steven, Way off Hmmmthe only thing I indeed forgot to mention is the directional antenna-danger, but to say I'm way off...that's a strong statement. First of all let me clarify myself. My final comment, Again, which solution to go for depends on your security needs and how much you're

RE: Securing a Aironet 350 [7:44152]

2002-05-14 Thread C restion
Btwthere's a great article on Wireless security on http://www.networkcomputing.com/1303/1303ws2.html This article also shows the importance of finding the right balance between risk assessment, cost and convenience. Message Posted at:

Re: Securing a Aironet 350 [7:44152]

2002-05-14 Thread Steven A. Ridder
True not everyone needs Fort Knox, but I just wanted make sure you didn't believe that WEP is secure. That's been my mantra the past month - to inform people to the dangers of relying on WEP. C restion wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Steven, Way off

RE: Securing a Aironet 350 [7:44152]

2002-05-14 Thread Patrick Ramsey
I think the only way to secure a wlan is to require vpn authentication through the bridge. (Which means some hand held clients would not be able to authenticate.) The client should have the vpn software loaded on their machine/laptop, connect to a bridge residing on a vlan that has no

RE: Securing a Aironet 350 [7:44152]

2002-05-14 Thread Charlie Wehner
What is the best way to secure a Aironet 350 from hackers? ***Keep it unplugged. ***Seriously though, LEAP is a good option if you want ease of use and pretty good security. It can be brute-forced if there isn't a user lock-out policy though. (You also need a Cisco ACS server or