Re: Serial interface problem [7:36423]

2002-02-25 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
You are getting very strange results indeed, but what you're tying to do is somewhat strange too. It seems that you are tying to get two parallel serial links to work: R1 s0 - s0 R2 R1 s1 - s1 R2 Are you sure that both 4000M routers support two active serial interfaces? I would start

RE: Serial interface problem [7:36423]

2002-02-26 Thread s vermill
I don't think Cisco publishes what the hex codes mean after the "new serial state = 0x" line. Anyone know? I did find reference to something generic that read "hardware has interrupted the software." You seem to have a lot going on in that regard. Every four or five seconds on both ends of

RE: Serial interface problem [7:36423]

2002-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 01:19 PM 2/26/02, s vermill wrote: >I don't think Cisco publishes what the hex codes mean after the "new serial >state = 0x" line. Anyone know? I don't think so either. I sometimes think that Cisco's debug tools are really designed to help their internal QA people more than their custome