Here are a couple, from our own archives:
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/cisco/22/msg00701.html
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/cisco/22/msg00653.html
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 8:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
www.cisco.com/cpress/cc/td/cpress/design/ospf/on0407.htm
That should help you
> -Original Message-
> From: Brandon Carroll [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 July 2000 14:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Stub Areas
>
> Is there a site that breaks down all the areas like,
Sean,
Doyle VOl1 page 465 says:
'The transit area cannot be a stub area'
>From that I would assume that a virtual link could not cross a stub area in
any fashion.
I will check when I ge a moment.
Rich
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41807&t=41744
---
The transit area can not be a stub, BUT the area utilizing the transit can
be a stub area.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41901&t=41744
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/c
That's what I thought.
Here's what I got from Boson:
...
Routers are not in areas, router interfaces are. Thus, the router
terminating the virtual link in your diagram has an interface in the
stub area and an interface in area 7 (a non-stub area). There is no
reason that a router with an inter
5 matches
Mail list logo
