: RE: TCP Ack numbers suddenly regress [7:56189]
The keepalive process shouldn't cause ACKs to go backwards. It should cause
them to stay the same. This doesn't sound like a keepalive situation which
should proceed smoothly. This situation involves a RESET which usually
indicates a problem
]
Subject: RE: TCP Ack numbers suddenly regress [7:56189]
The keepalive process shouldn't cause ACKs to go backwards. It
should cause
them to stay the same. This doesn't sound like a keepalive
situation which
should proceed smoothly. This situation involves a RESET which
usually
indicates
is now well.
Thanks again
Matt T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com]
Sent: 24 October 2002 17:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TCP Ack numbers suddenly regress [7:56189]
The keepalive process shouldn't cause ACKs to go
Ok you don't say what they host systems are but I am going to guess Unix of
some variety, in which case has anyone been playing around with the
keepalive timers ?
If the session keepalive timer is reached a probe is sent with the ACK
number set to ACK-1 i.e. telling the other end that the
The keepalive process shouldn't cause ACKs to go backwards. It should cause
them to stay the same. This doesn't sound like a keepalive situation which
should proceed smoothly. This situation involves a RESET which usually
indicates a problem of some sort, although possibly just a minor problem.
5 matches
Mail list logo