RE: The future of MCNS (Security)

2000-11-28 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Good idea. Security is too complex and too important to allow folks to palm themselves off as security experts on the mere basis of having passed an overly broad 70 question test. ( JMHO ) Chuck CCNP / Security ;- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Re: The future of MCNS (Security)

2000-11-28 Thread Vincent
I agree! After took the exam, I consider MCNS is a bit simple If the exam is a specialization level exam. "A.Strobel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/special1/changes_01- 01-01.html

RE: The future of MCNS (Security)

2000-11-28 Thread Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor
Great!! Great!! I love how they're moving on this and I love how they are again moving on this before any real security information is published. Advanced Pix? Why not start out with a better written guide for the regular Pix? -Original Message- From: A.Strobel [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: The future of MCNS (Security)

2000-11-28 Thread William Gragido
, November 28, 2000 7:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The future of MCNS (Security) I agree! After took the exam, I consider MCNS is a bit simple If the exam is a specialization level exam. "A.Strobel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL P

Re: The future of MCNS (Security)

2000-11-28 Thread Michael Snyder
Sh*t. I was planning on that after I did the CID. Guess I'm taking MCNS before 2001. ""A.Strobel"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/special1/changes_01- 01-01.html