ransparent Bridging ? [7:7126]
> OK, more than you ever wanted to know...
>
> The setup of the PCs is really no different than if they are on the same
> hub, switch vlan, or directly connected via a twist cable. The
configuration
> of the PCs has to be done in one of two ways:
>
>
OK, more than you ever wanted to know...
The setup of the PCs is really no different than if they are on the same
hub, switch vlan, or directly connected via a twist cable. The configuration
of the PCs has to be done in one of two ways:
1. Set the PCs to the same ip subnet and mask (the default
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Charles Manafa
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Transparent Bridging ? [7:7126]
Check your addressing. Both PCs should be on the same subnet, and do not
require a default gateway. A PC sho
Check your addressing. Both PCs should be on the same subnet, and do not
require a default gateway. A PC should not be configured with the IP address
of a bridge as the default gateway.
CM
-Original Message-
From: Philip Barker
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04/06/01 20:22
Subject: Transpar
k it again.
- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To: "Philip Barker" ;
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: Transparent Bridging ? [7:7126]
> The PC shouldn't ARP for a bridge. A bridge is transparent. It should ARP
> for the end station. Someth
It sounds to me like you still have a layer three address somehwere on one
of your routers, and that you maight still have a default gateway on one of
your PCs pointing to that adx.
I would pose the question, are both PC's configured to be on the same
network? DO they have the same mask?
If eit
The PC shouldn't ARP for a bridge. A bridge is transparent. It should ARP
for the end station. Something is weird with addressing and submasks.
Priscilla
At 03:22 PM 6/4/01, Philip Barker wrote:
>Hi Group,
> I vill say ziss only vonce.
>
>Okay, its my second attempt at trying to work out ho
7 matches
Mail list logo
