Re: VPN nat twice [7:27589]

2001-11-28 Thread Allen May
By NATed twice do you mean a different network or subnet? Each subnet is set as a rule in the client so you can connect to different networks as long as the network subnets don't overlap. Allen - Original Message - From: Jim Bond To: Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:09 PM Subject:

Re: VPN - NAT interoperability [7:20326]

2001-09-18 Thread Brant Stevens
You first decide what traffic you wan to tunnel. That traffic will match an access list for sening over the tunnel. I believe that plain old GRE tunneling is supported in the standard IP feature set, but I'm not sure. To make use of IPSec, I do believe you need the IP PLUS feature set, but I'm

Re: VPN NAT

2000-11-03 Thread Duane Morgan
SORRY, It won't happen again!! ever!! On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Chuck Larrieu wrote: one more reason to read my posts first - the link I sent is fine. can go in as either guest or registered. info looks to be about the same. here it is again. http://www.cisco.com/tac/newsflash/vpn2.html

RE: VPN NAT

2000-11-03 Thread Duane Morgan
Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Jason Baker wrote: it does work :) Regards, Jason Baker Network Engineer -Original Message- From: Greg Reaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN NAT This link doesn't work. Mind

RE: VPN NAT

2000-11-03 Thread Daniel Boutet1
Same here, but got it after the second try Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Reaume Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 8:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN NAT Sorry, when I clicked on the link when first posted

Re: VPN NAT

2000-11-02 Thread Chuck Larrieu
one more reason to read my posts first - the link I sent is fine. can go in as either guest or registered. info looks to be about the same. here it is again. http://www.cisco.com/tac/newsflash/vpn2.html Chuck "Greg Reaume" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:8tt4o9$cic$[EMAIL

Re: VPN NAT

2000-11-02 Thread Greg Reaume
Sorry, when I clicked on the link when first posted I got a request error. Not a document not found, but a 'request error'. I guess there were problems at the time, now it works. Thanks for the link. :) Greg ""Chuck Larrieu"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8tt5l2$dlg$[EMAIL