Re: back-to-back serial interfaces

2001-03-22 Thread John Neiberger
I had this exact issue a couple of months ago. The problem was that the flavor of HDLC in older IOS versions was not playing well with the newer versions. I upgraded the older version to a 12.x version and all was well. Regards, John >>> "Richard Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/22/01 4:06:55 PM

RE: back-to-back serial interfaces

2001-03-22 Thread Muhammad_Abduh
Rirchard, 1. If you use TCP/IP have you check IP address on both serial, it should be same network/sub network. 2. Do you try another serial port.. rgds abduh -Original Message- From: lancer979 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 06:07 AM To: c

Re: back-to-back serial interfaces

2001-03-22 Thread Circusnuts
riginal Message - From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:35 PM Subject: Re: back-to-back serial interfaces > I had this exact issue a couple of months ago. The problem was that the

Re: back-to-back serial interfaces

2001-03-22 Thread EA Louie
ROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 3:35 PM Subject: Re: back-to-back serial interfaces > I had this exact issue a couple of months ago. The problem was that the > flavor of HDLC in older IOS versions was not playing well with the newer > versions. I upgraded the older version

Re: back-to-back serial interfaces

2001-03-23 Thread Circusnuts
D]> To: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 4:16 AM Subject: Re: back-to-back serial interfaces > that is very frightening. Did Cisco release notes show a non-compatability > between the vers

Re: back-to-back serial interfaces

2001-03-23 Thread Richard Wilson
Sorry I forgot to say that the link works just fine with the DCE on the IOS 12.0 end. It doesn't work with the DCE on the IOS 11.0 end. The 12.0 end always comes up and the 11.0 end works just fine as a DTE. Richard --- Jason Kolevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you sure you don't have a