Re: classless to classfull routing issue

2001-03-07 Thread EA Louie
TED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:43 AM Subject: Re: classless to classfull routing issue > Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the respective > /28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the subnet > mask b

RE: classless to classfull routing issue

2001-03-07 Thread Stull, Cory
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: classless to classfull routing issue Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the respective /28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the subnet mask being u

Re: classless to classfull routing issue

2001-03-07 Thread Curtis Call
Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the respective /28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the subnet mask being used on the router is the subnet mask that a protocol update is using as well, if there is no matching mask they default to the stan

Re: classless to classfull routing issue

2001-03-07 Thread EA Louie
you'll just have to use the 24 bit masks that are default in the IGRP routing protocol. Or establish and redistribute static routes into your IGRP routing process. see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/52.html for some other direction -e- Prasanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 983ml

Re: classless to classfull routing issue

2001-03-06 Thread Arthur Simplina
I don't think that there is a solution to this. IGRP is classfull routing protocol and you can't change it's behavior. How about changing your IGRP to EIGRP? Any problems with this like conversion to all Cisco equipment? My 0.02c. Arthur >From: "Prasanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Pras