TED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: classless to classfull routing issue
> Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the
respective
> /28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the
subnet
> mask b
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: classless to classfull routing issue
Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the respective
/28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the subnet
mask being u
Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the respective
/28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the subnet
mask being used on the router is the subnet mask that a protocol update is
using as well, if there is no matching mask they default to the stan
you'll just have to use the 24 bit masks that are default in the IGRP
routing protocol. Or establish and redistribute static routes into your
IGRP routing process.
see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/52.html for some other direction
-e-
Prasanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
983ml
I don't think that there is a solution to this. IGRP is classfull routing
protocol and you can't change it's behavior.
How about changing your IGRP to EIGRP? Any problems with this like
conversion to all Cisco equipment?
My 0.02c.
Arthur
>From: "Prasanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Pras
5 matches
Mail list logo