A.
To: 'Charles Manafa' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:59 PM
Subject: RE: default-metric 64 vs 2.why?? [7:33231]
I thought redistribution into any other protocol besides OSPF would have a
metric of 0. 0 is not understood by EIGRP, IGRP or RIP and therefore won't
work
Remember, the metric on ospf is cost, the metric on rip is hops.
You always need a seed metric when redistributing, I can't explain why the
ospf continues to run, but thats what rip wo't work. Its the same with
EigrpIGRP, no metric, no work.
Message Posted at:
-
From: Vincent Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: default-metric 64 vs 2.why?? [7:33231]
Remember, the metric on ospf is cost, the metric on rip is hops.
You always need a seed metric when redistributing, I can't explain
-
From: Lupi, Guy
To:
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: default-metric 64 vs 2.why?? [7:33231]
It was a little confusing to me also while reading the new practical
studies
book, he does state that without a default metric or metric specified in
the
redistribution
: Charles Manafa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: default-metric 64 vs 2.why?? [7:33231]
When metric is not supplied, and there is no default metric, then routes
redistributed into RIP will have a metric of 16 (unreachable), routes
5 matches
Mail list logo
