Here's my $0.2...
Few questions, just to cover the obvious:
1) Is your ISP doing filtering that might prevent this route?
2) Did you ever advertise this without the distribute lists? If so, you
may
need to clear the bgp route to your 202.161.128.173 neighbor.
3) Although you have no synchroniz
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, suaveguru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have already configured BGP for but our trafiic for
> IP
> Address 202.95.159.0/24 not yet routing back via this
> circuit. Here is the
> configuration at our router. Can you tell us, what's
> wrong about our
> configuration.
check it with "sh i
he's got no synchronization, so it doesn't *need* to be in the internal
routing protocol does it?
Em
- Original Message -
From: McCallum, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'suaveguru' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 08
first thing is does your internal routing protocol know where it is?
-Original Message-
From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 December 2000 06:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: distribute list problem
Hi,
I have already configured BGP for but our trafiic for
IP
Address
Haven't distribute-lists for BGP been made obsolete by prefix-lists?
Regards,
Em
- Original Message -
From: suaveguru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:26 PM
Subject: distribute list problem
> Hi,
>
> I have already configured BGP for but o
5 matches
Mail list logo
