Re: Line Down , Protocol Up ?

2000-11-28 Thread Adam Hickey
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 1:24 AM Subject: Re: Line Down , Protocol Up ? > I have seen this question in one of the cisco exams ! > > The obvious answer was BUG ERROR ! > >

Re: Line Down , Protocol Up ?

2000-11-28 Thread Elias Aggelidis
I have seen this question in one of the cisco exams ! The obvious answer was BUG ERROR ! - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 4:22 AM Subject: Re: Line Down , Protocol Up ?

Re: Line Down , Protocol Up ?

2000-11-22 Thread John Neiberger
Think this through starting at the first OSI layer. If the line is down (physical) layer, then how could the next higher layer--which depends on lower layers--ever possibly hope to function? It can't. You can't have a functional datalink layer without first having valid physical connectivity.

Re: Line Down , Protocol Up ?

2000-11-22 Thread Paul Werner
> > Hi Gang, > > Just been looking at the binary possibilities of > > these options i.e 0 0 > > 0 1 > > 1 0 > > 1 1 > > > > And feel thet that Line Down, Protocol Up is > > impossible. > > Can anyone confirm this or has anyone seen anythin

RE: Line Down , Protocol Up ?

2000-11-22 Thread Taylor, Don
Title: RE: Line Down , Protocol Up ? You're correct; it's an impossible situation. If the line's down (e.g. circuit is unplugged), there's no way for protocol to pass. I used to use this question as a brainbuster with my coworkers. =) - Don -Original Message---

Re: Line Down , Protocol Up ?

2000-11-22 Thread Brian
line down, protocol up is *definitly* impossible :) Brian On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Phil Barker wrote: > Hi Gang, > Just been looking at the binary possibilities of > these options i.e 0 0 > 0 1 > 1 0 > 1 1 > > And feel thet that Line Down

RE: line down

2000-09-14 Thread Yee, Jason
thanks for all your support cheers!!! Jason -Original Message- From: William E Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 10:41 AM To: Yee, Jason; 'Plantier, William'; Felice Russell Cc: Cisco Groupstudy Subject: RE: line down Thats great to hear

RE: line down

2000-09-14 Thread William E Gragido
ll > Cc: Cisco Groupstudy > Subject: RE: line down > > > thanks for all your kindness and help , I have finally isolated is a modem > problem > > Jason > > -Original Message- > From: Plantier, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 1

RE: line down

2000-09-14 Thread Yee, Jason
thanks for all your kindness and help , I have finally isolated is a modem problem Jason -Original Message- From: Plantier, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 10:06 PM To: Felice Russell; Yee, Jason Cc: Cisco Groupstudy Subject: RE: line down You

RE: line down

2000-09-14 Thread Plantier, William
You might want to check your clocking also. > -Original Message- > From: Felice Russell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 8:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Cisco Groupstudy > Subject: line down > > Jason - > Have you checked the status of DTR (et