, no ip route-cache distributed. on the serials. And
route 4 defaults out via the outbound serial intfs.Hope this helps!
Regards, :-)
From: Chuck Larrieu Reply-To: Chuck Larrieu To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:56:41 -0400
If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use
a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use
the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP.
khramov wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am getting
can share their experiences with other ISPs?
James Willard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Scott M. Trieste
To:
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't
are you saying that CEF is buggy?
-Original Message-
From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't
4 T1s [7:15692]
are you saying that CEF is buggy?
-Original Message-
From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances
5 matches
Mail list logo