RE: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-07-01 Thread Peter zhang
what is the difference between nat (inside) 1 0 0 and nat 1 0 0 They are the same, nat all inside networks I am completely lost when to use netmask when not. Some statements are required to have one some not. Is there any rule about it that or I just have to memorize all.

Re: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-07-01 Thread Gaz
Must admit I've not seen it without the (interface) option. Does the nat 1 0 0 format equate to: nat (inside) 1 0 0 and nat (DMZ) 1 0 0 or just the inside interface? Not got a Pix to try it on until tomorrow, or at least if I do I'll probably lose the Pix I'm VPN'ing through :-) Gaz Peter

Re: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-07-01 Thread voitek
: Gaz To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:59 PM Subject: Re: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786] Must admit I've not seen it without the (interface) option. Does the nat 1 0 0 format equate to: nat (inside) 1 0 0 and nat (DMZ) 1 0 0 or just the inside interface? Not got a Pix

RE: need clarification on some PIX terms [7:47786]

2002-06-30 Thread ken clifford
both nat commands are effectively the same. I tried it on a pix 501 I have kicking around with 6.2.1 on it. netmask and inside/outside question are valid as they twist the syntax around all the time. Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47801t=47786