Cisco wrong? Perish the thought!!! ;->
seeing as 134 is 1110, and is in no way relevant here, I would suggest
that the lazy no good subcontractor that Cisco hired to write / proof / tech
review / whatever is wrong.
welcome to the world of study materials.
best wishes
Chuck
-Original M
]On Behalf Of
> Chuck Larrieu
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: route summarization question [7:19970]
>
>
> Cisco wrong? Perish the thought!!! ;->
>
> seeing as 134 is 1110, and is in no way relevant here, I wou
arrieu
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: route summarization question [7:19970]
>
>
> Cisco wrong? Perish the thought!!! ;->
>
> seeing as 134 is 1110, and is in no way relevant here, I would suggest
> that the lazy
cat's outta da bag now. but i'm sure your name will be there (Technical
Editor, Chuck Larrieu, CCIE 82**) on the front of every text.
;-)
-e-
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:11 AM
Subject: RE: route summarizati
4 matches
Mail list logo