RE: traceroute !A * !A meaning [7:915]

2001-04-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're right. !A is "administratively unreachable" which is generally an ACL... -Original Message- From: Gary Crouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 08:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: traceroute !A * !A meaning [7:915] what does the !A * 1A mean I think it mea

RE: traceroute !A * !A meaning [7:915]

2001-04-17 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Only a suggestion, but the fact that there are pairs of !A suggest that there might be per-packet load balancing going on, and the ACL applies only to one of the paths in the load-shared bundle. That could be why you get through on half the attempts (ignoring the * timeout which I'll assume is

Re: traceroute !A * !A meaning [7:915]

2001-04-17 Thread Marty Adkins
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > > Only a suggestion, but the fact that there are pairs of !A suggest > that there might be per-packet load balancing going on, and the ACL > applies only to one of the paths in the load-shared bundle. That > could be why you get through on half the attempts (ignorin

Re: traceroute !A * !A meaning [7:915]

2001-04-17 Thread Gary Crouch
you are correct This is a single 256k frame relay link >>> "Marty Adkins" 04/17/01 12:51PM >>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > > Only a suggestion, but the fact that there are pairs of !A suggest > that there might be per-packet load balancing going on, and the ACL > applies only to one of the pa

Re: traceroute !A * !A meaning [7:915]

2001-04-19 Thread Gareth Hinton
Good call Marty, I think a fair few people will have (as I did) confused the response (!A * !A) as five responses (ping), whereas it is three responses, two of "!A" and one of "*"(traceroute). Gaz ""Gary Crouch"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > you are