RE: was CEF and per packet load sharing [7:72258]

2003-07-14 Thread Lupi, Guy
We use CEF quite a bit, over 200 remote nodes with multiple circuits, it works out very well for us. The load on the circuits is always very close, I couldn't tell you with any certainty that it is within 1 to 2 percent though. I have had 2 issues with CEF in the past 2 years, and both involved FT

RE: was CEF and per packet load sharing [7:72258]

2003-07-14 Thread Reimer, Fred
"I had heard that etherchannel (or the IEEE derivative) would support nearly equal load splitting across N interfaces. And it also defines a mechanism so that the receiving router would be able to detect and re-order packets which arrive out of order)." I've never heard of that. In fact, excerpts

Re: was CEF and per packet load sharing [7:72258]

2003-07-14 Thread Zsombor Papp
At 06:18 PM 7/14/2003 +, p b wrote: >Consider two routers which have 3 GEs between them (no L2 >device between them). > >Is it "better" to configure each of these GEs as >a standalone L3 connection or to combine them GEs into >an etherchannel (802.1ae?) bundle? > >My $0.02 would be to keep them