RE: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]

2002-03-16 Thread Daniel Cotts
Thank you Erick! > -Original Message- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 9:55 PM > To: Daniel Cotts; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546] > > > I did some google searches and some site ment

RE: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]

2002-03-16 Thread Erick B.
I did some google searches and some site mentioned the A-version is the same module but the components used to make it were different and the cost was cheaper then the original. --- Daniel Cotts wrote: > Here's the output of a "show port capabilities" on > both a 5213 and a 5213A. > No differen

RE: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]

2002-03-16 Thread Daniel Cotts
Here's the output of a "show port capabilities" on both a 5213 and a 5213A. No difference. I seem to remember that the "A" version fixed some flaws in the older blade. I have no idea what they might be. I've found the 5213 in a 1996 catalog. The 5213A is in the '98 catalog. If price wasn't much di

Re: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]

2002-03-16 Thread MJ
I believe the A module supports ISL trunking where as the non-A version does not. ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone know the difference between these two modules ??? > > > > Thanks > > Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3855

Re: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546]

2002-03-16 Thread Gaz
Phil, The ws-x5213a replaced the ws-x5213. They are both now end of life, but the 5213 was eol quite a while ago and is now unsupported (well it will be in a couple of weeks). Actual differences though I don't know - very similar to the eye. Gaz ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PR