yes.
how are you going to test that it's working?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Lupi, Guy
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bridging [7:20078]
Can you configure bridging using only serial
If I'm not mistaken- the CCIE proctors have no way of checking bridging
beyond a wink & nod @ the configs either.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: RE: Bridging [7:20078]
> yes.
>
> ho
Sure but I'm at a loss to understand what good it would do.
Dave
"Lupi, Guy" wrote:
> Can you configure bridging using only serial interfaces, no ethernet
> involved at all? I have a 2501 connected to a 2511, and a 2503 connected
to
> the same 2511, both via serial. I want to configure the
> Sure but I'm at a loss to understand what good it would do.
If the 2511 was the hub of a hub and spoke WAN, and there was an application
between the other two sites that required bridging, that's what good it
would do.
>
> Dave
>
> "Lupi, Guy" wrote:
>
> > Can you configure bridging using on
1 is forwarding
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 9/15/2001 9:09 PM
Subject: RE: Bridging [7:20078]
yes.
how are you going to test that it's working?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Lup
n that all bridgeable protocols are bridged by
default.
-Original Message-
From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 7:27 PM
To: 'Chuck Larrieu '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Subject: RE: Bridging [7:20078]
What I was going to do was set up 192.
-trip min/avg/max = 68/68/68 ms
R3#
- Original Message -
From: "Lupi, Guy"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: Bridging [7:20078]
> What I was going to do was set up 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 on the
serial
> interface of the 2501 and 192.168.1.2 25
Yes but the original post stated bridging ONLY on the serial and not
on a LAN interface so my point is still valid.
Dave
EA Louie wrote:
>
> > Sure but I'm at a loss to understand what good it would do.
>
> If the 2511 was the hub of a hub and spoke WAN, and there was an
application
> betwee
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bridging [7:20078]
It actually works fine for a spanning tree bridge with no CRB or IRB...
lo0 172.17.3.1
|
R1
| s0 172.17.1.1
| s0 172.17.1.2
R2
| s1 172.17.1.3
| s0 172.17.1.4
R3
|
lo0 172.17.2.1
***R2 config***
!
interface Serial0
bandwidth 154
ssage -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To: "EA Louie" ;
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:48 PM
Subject: RE: Bridging [7:20078]
> hate to say it, but you are routing, not bridging. you have RIP turned on,
> and you have IP addresses for the classful 172.17.0.0 network on all
&g
10 matches
Mail list logo
