Re: OSPF neighbour query [7:38312]

2002-03-14 Thread Steven A. Ridder
the mask is the wrong length. neighbors have to agree on mask length. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Chhetri Naresh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... HI Guys I have an OSPF question andmy network setup is as follows: R1--Switch--R2 R1 has an ip addres of

Re: OSPF neighbour query [7:38312]

2002-03-14 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Reading your output further, the router told you that the masks didn't match: OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 10.103.56.1 Dead R 40 C 40, Hello R 10 C 10 Mask R 255.255.248.0 C 255.255.240.0 -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Steven A. Ridder wrote in message [EMAIL

Re: OSPF neighbour query [7:38312]

2002-03-14 Thread Tshon
You also type it out to us: R1 has an ip address of 10.103.56.97/20 and R2 has an ip address of 10.103.56.1/21 Steven A. Ridder wrote: Reading your output further, the router told you that the masks didn't match: OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 10.103.56.1 Dead R 40 C 40, Hello R

Re: OSPF neighbour query [7:38312]

2002-03-14 Thread Chhetri Naresh
Thanks Guys For your response. The question which is not clear to me (thats a fundamental one) is even if the network statement under OSPF includes both the subnets, is it necessary to form a neighbour that the subnet mask should be the same on a broadcast medium like ethernet considering the