Re: sanity check - NAT [7:410]

2001-04-12 Thread Kirk Bollinger
My .02 cents I don't think you need the ip nat outside source static - just the inside static is all that is required. If overloading I *believe* that it will overload on one IP before using up the pool so - why not just use a pool of one. Also, best to not let the static be within the pool rang

Re: sanity check - NAT [7:410]

2001-04-12 Thread David Chandler
Seem to be missing a couple of things. 1. The serial interface is not running IP. 2. Once you NAT the packets and send them on to the next-hop router; how does the next-hop router & network know to return the packets to this router? Assuming that you are using static routes, and the p

RE: sanity check - NAT [7:410]

2001-04-12 Thread Daniel Cotts
Me thinks that you have already been there. I don't see an ip address on the S0 interface. Should it be 203.181.70.65 ? Had to look up "ip nat outside source static". Cisco says " If you use the ip nat inside command, these packets must originate from the inside. If you use the ip nat outside comm