Greetings all,
We're converting our 3Com router world to Cisco soon and I have a question
regarding the OSPF design. I'm including a link to a JPG in case anyone
wants to add their 2 cents. You can see it at:
http://members.tripod.com/~bobtimmons/network-1.jpg
This is a somewhat simplistic vi
I'm not sure where you got the idea that one big area zero is a bad thing?
In this case, I would highly recommend it. This is a pretty small network
and I really don't see the benefit of adding hierarchy to it from a
multi-area perspective. Keep in mind that the more you segment an OSPF area
in
>I'm not sure where you got the idea that one big area zero is a bad thing?
Me, as one example.
But let me make an important distinction, borrowing from George Orwell
Four legs good One big area not necessarily bad
Two legs bad One big area zero bad
If y
I should have limited that to one big area vs one big area 0. I'm all for
single areas when they suit, but I agree that using a non zero area can have
some benefits.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/17/2001 at 10:24 AM Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>I'm not sure where you got the id
Thanks for the input. We did the upgrade this weekend and all went well.
Bob
> I should have limited that to one big area vs one big area 0. I'm all for
> single areas when they suit, but I agree that using a non zero area can
have
> some benefits.
>
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
5 matches
Mail list logo
