Is this the equivalent of TTL expired in transit?
Ejay Hire
-Original Message-
From: Lists Wizard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Redirect response from 10.100.65.212 [7:3392]
I tried pinging a remote host from a set-based
The pigeon didn't make it back.
Seriously though it does look like TTL expired.
Allen May
- Original Message -
From: Hire, Ejay
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:22 AM
Subject: RE: Redirect response from 10.100.65.212 [7:3392]
Is this the equivalent of TTL expired in transit
in transit?
Ejay Hire
-Original Message-
From: Lists Wizard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Redirect response from 10.100.65.212 [7:3392]
I tried pinging a remote host from a set-based switch. The ping did not go
throutgh the first
I tried pinging a remote host from a set-based switch. The ping did not go
throutgh the first time because the switch was configured with wrong default
gateway and I received a redirect response from a host that I do not any
thing
about. Could some one explain what is happening from the output of
4 matches
Mail list logo
