RE: Replacing a router with PIX [7:40454]

2002-04-05 Thread John Jackson
I would also add, make sure the ISP dosen't require you to run an IGP. From what I understand PIX does not support IGPs. Most likely this is not the case, if You just set your default route to your outside interface, and they staticly route to you. John Message Posted at:

Replacing a router with PIX [7:40454]

2002-04-04 Thread Jeffrey Reed
Im working on a design where we have a 3640 with dual T1s to the Internet. The customer is using MS Proxy as their security enforcement point with a few ACLs on the router. They are soon getting a new ISP who will be dropping off a 10M Ethernet connection to replace the T1s. Is there any reason

Re: Replacing a router with PIX [7:40454]

2002-04-04 Thread Steven A Ridder
No, you should. There is no reason not to do it besides Layer 8 ($). -- RFC 1149 Compliant Jeffrey Reed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Im working on a design where we have a 3640 with dual T1s to the Internet. The customer is using MS Proxy as their security

RE: Replacing a router with PIX [7:40454]

2002-04-04 Thread Kent Hundley
: Replacing a router with PIX [7:40454] Im working on a design where we have a 3640 with dual T1s to the Internet. The customer is using MS Proxy as their security enforcement point with a few ACLs on the router. They are soon getting a new ISP who will be dropping off a 10M Ethernet connection