The only thing I can think of is with that setup you have, any traffic from
source .1.0 to destination 2.0 will be routed via the loopback and thus
droppedCan't think of anything else
Kenny
"Adrian Chew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8lskht$quq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8lskht$quq$[
Brian,
Thanks for the example - hitting the loopbacks on REMOTE routers is easy to
understand (as is loopback interfaces for BGP connections and OSPF Router
IDs). However, I've seen traffic being routed to an IP address on the same
subnet as the router's loopback interface is on. Eg.
E0 > R1 >
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Adrian Chew wrote:
> I've seen this in some configurations where traffic is sent via a route-map
> to an IP address that is on the same subnet as a router's loopback
> interface.
>
> Eg.
>
> interface ethernet 0
> ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip policy route-map
I've seen this in some configurations where traffic is sent via a route-map
to an IP address that is on the same subnet as a router's loopback
interface.
Eg.
interface ethernet 0
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map abc
interface loopback 0
ip address 192.168.255.1 255.255
4 matches
Mail list logo
