Tom,
Can you please elaborate how the outbound filter with the community tag of
no-export would help... as I'm still not too clear what it will achieve.
And sorry for the stupid question...
Thanks again.
Best Regards,
Hunt Lee
WebCentral
""Tom Martin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">ne
Tom,
Can you please elaborate how the outbound filter with the community tag of
no-export would help... as I'm still not too clear what it will achieve.
And sorry for the stupid question...
Thanks again.
Best Regards,
Hunt Lee
""Tom Martin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Thanks so much for your helpful explanation Tom :)
Hunt
""Tom Martin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hunt,
>
> You are correct, there is nothing filtering the routes entering from
> Router B, without local preference set higher on 10.1.1.1 (Router A?) for
>
Hunt,
You are correct, there is nothing filtering the routes entering from
Router B, without local preference set higher on 10.1.1.1 (Router A?) for
the routes, nothing will prevent AS 202 from being used for other
destinations as well.
More confusing to me is the configuration.
I read the ques
I have a Route-Map question that I'm very confused about:
The scenario is from Caslow (p840), it is as follows:
Company A has a full T3 connection to the Internet thru the ISP AAA-101.NET.
Company B has a T1 connection to the Internet thru the ISP BBB-202.Net.
Company A acquires Company B, but
5 matches
Mail list logo