Routing table question using BGP

2001-02-20 Thread scott
Hello all - I may have been working on this too long. Take a look at the following network. AS100 iBGP AS100 22.22.22.0 11.11.11.0 R2-173.4.175.19--173.4.175.17-R1http://www.group

Re: Routing table question using BGP

2001-02-20 Thread Ahmed Aden
Scott, I think the problem is with you putting 'no synchronization' in router1. I would also say that if you did a ping to 33.33.33.1 from router2 it would work because the 192 net is reachable from router2. When you issue a 'no synchronization' you are saying that if this route is being annou

Re: Routing table question using BGP

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Van Oene
Couple comments inserted below *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 2/20/2001 at 11:55 AM Ahmed Aden wrote: >Scott, > >I think the problem is with you putting 'no synchronization' in >router1. I would also say that if you did a ping to 33.33.33.1 from >router2 it would work because the

Re: Routing table question using BGP - SOLVED

2001-02-23 Thread scott
To: Peter, Ahmed and Groupstudy First, thanks to everyone for their help. Second, here is what I learned... The problem was a configuration error on my part but not with BGP. As Peter stated, a router will not install a route where it cannot find the route for the next hop. So, with my exam