y Routin
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Static NAT Problem [7:49714]
BTW, only post once... we'll see you and we'll get to it. If you post
the
same thing multiple times you'll be ignored for being rude.
JR
--
Johnny Routin
Don Claybrook wrote in
I have a customer using a single address for port forwarding. The
translation
for 192.168.1.2 to
12.13.14.15 using port 5631 works fine. When I issue the command show ip nat
translations, I get
the output as shown on the last line. The inside global and inside local are
both listed on
port
I would take off the extendable keyword.
JR
--
Johnny Routin
Don Claybrook wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a customer using a single address for port forwarding. The
translation
for 192.168.1.2 to
12.13.14.15 using port 5631 works fine. When I
BTW, only post once... we'll see you and we'll get to it. If you post the
same thing multiple times you'll be ignored for being rude.
JR
--
Johnny Routin
Don Claybrook wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a customer using a single address for port
you suggest I remove this, Mr. Routen?
Don Claybrook
CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
- Original Message -
From: Johnny Routin
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Static NAT Problem [7:49714]
BTW, only post once... we'll see you and we'll get to it. If you post the
same thing
5 matches
Mail list logo