Re: Static NAT Problem [7:49714]

2002-07-26 Thread Johnny Routin
y Routin To: Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:30 PM Subject: Re: Static NAT Problem [7:49714] BTW, only post once... we'll see you and we'll get to it. If you post the same thing multiple times you'll be ignored for being rude. JR -- Johnny Routin Don Claybrook wrote in

Static NAT Problem [7:49714]

2002-07-25 Thread Don Claybrook
I have a customer using a single address for port forwarding. The translation for 192.168.1.2 to 12.13.14.15 using port 5631 works fine. When I issue the command show ip nat translations, I get the output as shown on the last line. The inside global and inside local are both listed on port

Re: Static NAT Problem [7:49714]

2002-07-25 Thread Johnny Routin
I would take off the extendable keyword. JR -- Johnny Routin Don Claybrook wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have a customer using a single address for port forwarding. The translation for 192.168.1.2 to 12.13.14.15 using port 5631 works fine. When I

Re: Static NAT Problem [7:49714]

2002-07-25 Thread Johnny Routin
BTW, only post once... we'll see you and we'll get to it. If you post the same thing multiple times you'll be ignored for being rude. JR -- Johnny Routin Don Claybrook wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have a customer using a single address for port

Re: Static NAT Problem [7:49714]

2002-07-25 Thread Don Claybrook
you suggest I remove this, Mr. Routen? Don Claybrook CCNP, CCDP, CSS1 - Original Message - From: Johnny Routin To: Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:30 PM Subject: Re: Static NAT Problem [7:49714] BTW, only post once... we'll see you and we'll get to it. If you post the same thing