Have you tried disabling ip route-cache?? In the past couple weeks I have run into two route-cache bugs.
Dave Brian wrote: > so what does sh ip ro 193.0.0.193 give? If only the one static, then try > debugging icmp on a ping test.. > > Bri > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Hamid wrote: > > > As I mentioned before, there is no load balancing. Here are my route > > statements. (my CLASS C IPs have been replaced by 172.16.1.0, but actually > > there is no 172.16.1.0 network) > > > > Router#sh run | include ip route > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial4/0 > > ip route 193.0.0.193 255.255.255.255 Serial4/0 > > ip route 172.16.1.128 255.255.255.192 192.168.10.20 > > ip route 172.16.1.184 255.255.255.248 FastEthernet0/0.4 172.16.1.180 > > ip route 172.16.1.248 255.255.255.252 172.16.1.20 > > ip route 172.16.1.136 255.255.255.248 172.16.1.130 > > ip route 172.16.1.144 255.255.255.240 172.16.1.130 > > ip route 172.16.1.160 255.255.255.224 172.16.1.130 > > > > > > ""Brian"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Lets see all your ip route route statements, and are you running routing > > > protocols? > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Hamid wrote: > > > > > > > I tried adding a static route with 193.0.0.193 255.255.255.255 to the > > > router > > > > but still the problem is not resolved. > > > > > > > > The problem is that every host in the internet is pinged with exactly > > 50% > > > > seccess rate. I have only one default route so I don't think there is > > any > > > > load balancing. > > > > > > > > Any commnets??? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Hamid > > > > > > > > ""Brian"" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > The every other packet behavior sometimes indicates multiple static > > > > > routes, do a sh ip ro for the dest and see whats there.. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Hamid Ali Asgari wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi group, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a router which is the main gateway of my network. All the > > > > > > hosts on my network can successfully ping everywhere on the > > internet, > > > > > > but the ROUTER itself has always a success rate at 50%. Bellow is > > the > > > > > > ping result: > > > > > > > > > > > > Router#ping > > > > > > Protocol [ip]: > > > > > > Target IP address: 193.0.0.193 > > > > > > Repeat count [5]: 10 > > > > > > Datagram size [100]: > > > > > > Timeout in seconds [2]: > > > > > > Extended commands [n]: > > > > > > Sweep range of sizes [n]: > > > > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > > > > > Sending 10, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 193.0.0.193, timeout is 2 > > seconds: > > > > > > !.!.!.!.!. > > > > > > Success rate is 50 percent (5/10), round-trip min/avg/max = > > > > > > > > > > > > Same time my computer which is exactly behind the router can ping > > > > > > 193.0.0.193 without any errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No routing protocol is running on the router and it's using simple > > > > > > static routes and all of its interfaces have VALID IP addresses. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any idea what the problem is ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! > > > > > > http://auctions.yahoo.com -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications Inc. 612-664-3367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34208&t=34208 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
