may be you can use the following mathod instead of CQ. Cause CQ is custom queue, maybe it will lead to a delay in the VOIP if the queue-size is not optimized well.
So, may be you can use NBAR to adjust the bandwidth consumption between the Voice IP traffic and normal IP traffic first you define the Access-list for your IP traffic eg. in your first site, a network 192.168.100.X / 24 second site , a network 192.168.101.X/24 access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.101.0 0.0.0.255 then create a Class MAP for the IP traffic class-map IPTraffic match access-group 101 then, create a POLICY Class for the IP traffic and define the bandwidth you would like to used for the IP traffic policy-map IPTraffic class IPTraffic bandwidth 10000 Hi there, > > I have a setup where I think I 'd need to use CQ but the documents that > I found at cisco's site where not enough to understand / "master" the > subject. > > Here is my scenario : > > I have a cisco 1750 in my branch office and another one on a remote > site. Each cisco has two leased lines, one PPP and the other > Frame-relay, both operating with 64K. I use VoIP to make the phone > calls and I have database systems located at the remote site. > > I need to set up some sort of priority so I could optimize the > overall usage "reserving" bandwidth for more critical applications. > After searching I found that either policy routing or custom queue > should do the job (in one way or another), with CQ being the "correct" one. > > Can you help me out ? The examples that I found were too simple for > me to make any kind of decision. > > I am specially confused with the decision of setting a queue size. > > Best regards, > Mario Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37823&t=37823 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
