Re: Unexpected behavior of IGRP and EIGRP [7:64625]

2003-03-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dy.com em 07/03/2003 21:38:07 Favor responder a "Amar KHELIFI" Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Assunto:Re: Unexpected behavior of IGRP and EIGRP [7:64625] Hi, actually it is Eigrp that has a better AD than Igrp, 90 and 100, respectively, the ro

Re: Unexpected behavior of IGRP and EIGRP [7:64625]

2003-03-07 Thread Amar KHELIFI
Hi, actually it is Eigrp that has a better AD than Igrp, 90 and 100, respectively, the route u see in ur table has 170 as the AD, therefore External EIGRP,caused by the implicit redistribution, imposed when using these routing protocols with the same AS. so u are having normal behavior of the proto

Unexpected behavior of IGRP and EIGRP [7:64625]

2003-03-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R1 R2 R3 router R1 is running igrp process 1 router R2 is running igrp process 1 and eigrp process 2 router R3 is running igrp process 1 and eigrp process 2 R1 is running IGRP on network 10.0.0.0. I would expect R1 advertise router 10.0.0.0 to R2 via igrp and R2 advertise 1