Re: VPN 3005 Conc. & Windows2k Clients [7:21011]

2001-10-03 Thread Hansraj Patil
It is much easier to set up using shared secret keys than using digital certificates. It is not must that you have to use digital certificate. >From: "cisco skin" >Reply-To: "cisco skin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: VPN 3005 Conc. & Windows2k Clien

Re: VPN 3005 Conc. & Windows2k Clients [7:21011]

2001-09-25 Thread Jeff Smith
quot;cisco skin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: VPN 3005 Conc. & Windows2k Clients [7:21011] >Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:05:17 -0400 > >Just curious how you guys have set this up... > >I have Win95 and Win2k clients that need to come into a Cisco 3005 VPN >Concentrato

RE: VPN 3005 Conc. & Windows2k Clients [7:21011]

2001-09-25 Thread Stull, Cory
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN 3005 Conc. & Windows2k Clients [7:21011] Just curious how you guys have set this up... I have Win95 and Win2k clients that need to come into a Cisco 3005 VPN Concentrator. I've got the Authentication bit down

VPN 3005 Conc. & Windows2k Clients [7:21011]

2001-09-25 Thread cisco skin
Just curious how you guys have set this up... I have Win95 and Win2k clients that need to come into a Cisco 3005 VPN Concentrator. I've got the Authentication bit down but seem to be having trouble with the tunnel side of the house. What's the best way to set this up... I would rather not mess w