Hi,

I guess you can config a static nat mapping
and reverse the inside and outside interface.

that is ,
ip nat inside source static  192.168.3.31 50.100.167.102
interface e0
    ip nat outside
interface e1
    ip nat inside

-Michael

"Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" wrote in message
...
>Hi..dear all,
>
>We have a requirment to NAT a destination virtual IP to a different IP
>behind the "Firewall".  I have set up a cisco 2500 "packet filter" with 2
>interfaces ethernet0, 50.100.167.101 and ethernet1 192.168.3.2 and they are
>in two different networks. There is a SUN host 192.168.3.31 (A) in
>192.168.3.X network,  We want to contact A in network 192.168.3.X from B
>(50.100.167.199) in network 50.100.167.x via a virtual IP 50.100.167.102 in
>eth0.  What I mean when I connect to 50.100.167.102, I actually connect to
>192.168.3.31, but people won't know the real IP of that.   Can Cisco IOS
>router do this?  The information I get can only translate the source IP
>address.  How about destination address?  If yes, can you show me how is
the
>command look like?
>
>
>CT
>
>==================================================================
>De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
>is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
>onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
>de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
>==================================================================
>The information contained in this message may be confidential
>and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
>receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
>herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
>
>
>==================================================================




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7037&t=7037
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to