Does any body know the answer to this one? Now I am getting a bit
frustrated. I have posted to this group only a couple of times and I never
get an answer. All I get is people asking me to look at the archives. I did
as much homework as possible before asking the group.
""Neil Desai"" [EMAIL
]
Subject: Re: canonical and non-canonical addresses
Does any body know the answer to this one? Now I am getting a bit
frustrated. I have posted to this group only a couple of times and I never
get an answer. All I get is people asking me to look at the archives. I did
as much homework as possible
68 04
regards,
mohan
-Original Message-
From: Maness, Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: canonical and non-canonical addresses
Neil,
I'm not sure what your question is. The bits o
I am having a problem understanding the issues between canonical and
non-canonical addressing. I understand that the bits are flipped within the
byte. On page 32-33 of Interconnections Second Edition she gives the example
of the address a2-41-42-59-31-51.
Canonical:
10100010 0101 0110
4 matches
Mail list logo