you'll just have to use the 24 bit masks that are default in the IGRP
routing protocol. Or establish and redistribute static routes into your
IGRP routing process.
see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/52.html for some other direction
-e-
Prasanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the respective
/28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the subnet
mask being used on the router is the subnet mask that a protocol update is
using as well, if there is no matching mask they default to the
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: classless to classfull routing issue
Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the respective
/28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the subnet
mask being used
: Curtis Call [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: classless to classfull routing issue
Once solution would be to define multiple subinterfaces with the
respective
/28, /26, and /25 network masks. Classful protocols assume that the
subnet
mask
Hi Guys
I was trying to redistribute from OSPF Domain ( has variable subnets ,/24,
/28 , /26 /25 ) to IGRP domain ( /24 ) , i got severe masking issue as
IGRP is classfull and i could able to redistribute only /24 subnets .I was
trying to implement summary address with /24 towards IGRP but
TED]
Reply-To: "Prasanna" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: classless to classfull routing issue
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:41:27 -0500
Hi Guys
I was trying to redistribute from OSPF Domain ( has variable subnets
,/24,
/28 , /26 /25 ) to IGRP domain ( /24 ) , i got severe ma
6 matches
Mail list logo
