ieves this.
>From: "The Long and Winding Road"
>Reply-To: "The Long and Winding Road"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ebgp vs ebgp multihop [7:66127]
>Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:48:53 GMT
>
>wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Hi all
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi all,
>
> i would like to know your opinion/experience about using ebgp multihop
> comparing with ebgp. AFAIK, ebgp was designed for directly connected only
> and using ebgp multhop is not recomended for ISP envy. would you please
> tell me the caveat of
One reason I can think of is that ebgp-multihop (in the lab) allows me to
peer to a remote router's loopback interface. This can somewhat overcome
situations wherein the main link can be down, but there still exists another
link in which I can keep the neighborship up for whatever reason. As BGP
ru
Hi all,
i would like to know your opinion/experience about using ebgp multihop
comparing with ebgp. AFAIK, ebgp was designed for directly connected only
and using ebgp multhop is not recomended for ISP envy. would you please
tell me the caveat of using ebgp multihop for ISP envy.
Any comments wou
4 matches
Mail list logo