RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]

2001-08-14 Thread Cisco Nuts
, no ip route-cache distributed. on the serials. And route 4 defaults out via the outbound serial intfs.Hope this helps! Regards, :-) From: Chuck Larrieu Reply-To: Chuck Larrieu To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:56:41 -0400

Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]

2001-08-13 Thread Scott M. Trieste
If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP. khramov wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am getting

Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]

2001-08-13 Thread James Willard
can share their experiences with other ISPs? James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Scott M. Trieste To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't

RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]

2001-08-13 Thread Schneider, Matt
are you saying that CEF is buggy? -Original Message- From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't

RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]

2001-08-13 Thread Chuck Larrieu
4 T1s [7:15692] are you saying that CEF is buggy? -Original Message- From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692] If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances