To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:00 PM
Subject: RE: management platforms [7:49042]
> If the Wan Guys were the only one who could access the NMS, then I would
> agree, but giving "others" access to our Routers scares me.
> We started adding some of our Lan Guys to the Wha
just having a hard time justifing the extra product that I cant see
that
> we need.
>
> Thanks to all for the input!
>
> Thanks
>
> Larry
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:36 PM
>
IL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: management platforms [7:49042]
You would be going against conventional wisdom, Cisco's Kool-ade and every
other help-desk manager. I think one platform SHOULD manage all the stuf.
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">n
You would be going against conventional wisdom, Cisco's Kool-ade and every
other help-desk manager. I think one platform SHOULD manage all the stuf.
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Guys,
>
> I'm trying to justify why I don't want a single mana
Guys,
I'm trying to justify why I don't want a single management platform for all
our servers, as well as our routers and switches.
We are 2 distinct group with no cross-functionality between the Wan group
and the Server group.
Our Server guys are trying to purchase OpenView to manage it all, bu
5 matches
Mail list logo