Re: management platforms [7:49042]

2002-07-18 Thread Don Queen
To: Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:00 PM Subject: RE: management platforms [7:49042] > If the Wan Guys were the only one who could access the NMS, then I would > agree, but giving "others" access to our Routers scares me. > We started adding some of our Lan Guys to the Wha

Re: management platforms [7:49042]

2002-07-18 Thread Steven A. Ridder
just having a hard time justifing the extra product that I cant see that > we need. > > Thanks to all for the input! > > Thanks > > Larry > > > -Original Message- > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:36 PM >

RE: management platforms [7:49042]

2002-07-17 Thread Roberts, Larry
IL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: management platforms [7:49042] You would be going against conventional wisdom, Cisco's Kool-ade and every other help-desk manager. I think one platform SHOULD manage all the stuf. ""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">n

Re: management platforms [7:49042]

2002-07-17 Thread Steven A. Ridder
You would be going against conventional wisdom, Cisco's Kool-ade and every other help-desk manager. I think one platform SHOULD manage all the stuf. ""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Guys, > > I'm trying to justify why I don't want a single mana

OT: management platforms [7:49042]

2002-07-17 Thread Roberts, Larry
Guys, I'm trying to justify why I don't want a single management platform for all our servers, as well as our routers and switches. We are 2 distinct group with no cross-functionality between the Wan group and the Server group. Our Server guys are trying to purchase OpenView to manage it all, bu