Re: nat problem [7:55537]

Robert, Apologies - comes from reading too quickly :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55564&t=55537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondi

Re: nat problem [7:55537]

Richard, Can't be. We geeks don't do that. And if we do, we never admit it. ""Richard Botham"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Robert, > Apologies - comes from reading too quickly :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55565&t=55

Re: nat problem [7:55537]

sorry Robert,I did add the route of 1.1.1.1 on interface e0/1 at 14 Oct 2002 14:08:08 - , [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Robert Edmonds") wrote: -- >Two comments I would like to make. >1. Richard, the gateway of last resort IS on the same network as E0/0. The >subnet mask is 255.255.0.0. >2. The rou

Re: nat problem [7:55537]

Two comments I would like to make. 1. Richard, the gateway of last resort IS on the same network as E0/0. The subnet mask is 255.255.0.0. 2. The route you added tells the router that 1.1.1.1 is out interface E0/0. It's on E0/1. So that definitely won't work. If you remove the NAT statements, a

RE: nat problem [7:55537]

Hi, Looking at this, there appears to be no dynamic routing happening. The gateway of last resort is on a different network than E0/0 and E0/1. Can you actually reach 10.1.255.254 by any other means ? Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55542&t=5553

nat problem [7:55537]

hi eb, I met a problem here: a Cicsco 2611#: Router#show running-config Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname Router ! ! ip subnet-zero ! interface Ethern