Hi That was a brialliant attempt by priscilla. I hope we can get somehing this to prep for ccie. Bunmi Isinkaye Cisco Certification Digest wrote: Cisco Certification Digest Friday, August 30 2002 Volume 02 : Number 2232
In this issue of the Cisco Certification Mailing List Digest: Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Tonight's Homily - Other Important Things [7:52347] RE: unidentified cisco cable [7:52296] OT: Las Vegas Cisco users group [7:52341] switch over fax [7:52350] Re: Gatekeeper not completing calls [7:52315] Re: unidentified cisco cable [7:52296] new examine CCIE R&S [7:52355] Re: FXS and Key System connection [7:52288] Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Cisco Netacad for 640-603 [7:52358] Boston Cisco Users Group? [7:52359] RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285] RE: Cisco Netacad for 640-603 [7:52358] Re: 2500 Memory Question. [7:52097] Re: Looking for Memory [7:52033] Re: unidentified cisco cable [7:52296] Re: routing problem? [7:52054] Build your own PIX [7:52364] Re: Cisco Netacad for 640-603 [7:52358] RE: CCIE qualification Exam, misconception? Longi [7:52235] Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Re: unidentified cisco cable [7:52296] RE: what to put ???? [7:51574] Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Re: Cisco Netacad for 640-603 [7:52358] CCIE Written study partner wanted!! [7:52373] RE: Looking for Memory [7:52033] OT - testng spam filter - please ignore [7:52375] Re: Syslog server for Whatsup Gold [7:52269] EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377] RE: Boston Cisco Users Group? [7:52359] RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377] Reloading VIP [7:52380] RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377] Re: Reloading VIP [7:52380] RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377] Re: Reloading VIP [7:52380] RE: Reloading VIP [7:52380] RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285] RE: CCIE qualification Exam, misconception? Longi [7:52235] ACS Single SignOn (Cisco 5350/VPN3060/RADIUS) [7:52387] RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377] Re: Reloading VIP [7:52380] RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285] Re: Cisco Netacad for 640-603 [7:52358] RE: new examine CCIE R&S [7:52355] RE: Boston Cisco Users Group? [7:52359] RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285] Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285] Re: Reloading VIP [7:52380] RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285] RE: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285] Lab Swap in SJ [7:52400] Re: ICQ and blocking the thing-PIX [7:52285] RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377] RE: 3550 and 3524 [7:52286] RE: CCIE qualification Exam, misconception? Longi [7:52235] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 04:46:50 GMT From: "Erick B." Subject: Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Where does the 10.258.52.x network reside in your network? I'm guessing it also uses a 255.255.255.0 mask. If there is a PC or PC's on one of the 1605 ethernet segments with a 10.258.52.x address then you will need to add a secondary IP address to the interface those devices are off of. This is also called a multinetted interface. interface e0 ip address 10.258.52.x 255.255.255.0 secondary If the 10.258.52.x is on another router in your network then you add a static route or enable a dynamic routing protocol between the routers. The static route next hop will be an adjancent router off one of the 1605 interfaces. Example: ip route 10.258.52.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.1.x where x is the other router on the 10.1.1.x/24 network. That router would also need routes back to the 1605 networks. HTH, Erick - --- Craig Robertson wrote: > Hi guys, > I am having a problem with routing on a Cisco1605 > router. Ethernet0 is set > to 10.1.1.17 255.255.255.0 and ethernet1 is set to > 10.128.52.1 255.255.255.0 > My problem is: > > From the 10.1.1.0 network i can ping 10.1.1.17 > (ethernet0) > From the 10.1.1.0 network i can ping 10.128.52.1 > (ethernet1) > From the 10.1.1.0 network I can NOT ping > 10.258.52.101 (pc on subnet) > > I have enabled ip routing on the router, however, > nothing has changed. > > Can anyone please advise of the command(s) for a > static route, if indeed > this is the problem. Any suggestions would be > appreciated. > > Thanks __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 04:51:48 GMT From: "Craig Robertson" Subject: Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Sorry guys, the address of the PC is 10.128.52.101, not "258". Nice typo hey :-) Thanks ""Vance Krier"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Is the PC really 10."""258""".52.101..? > > V-- > > > > ""Craig Robertson"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi guys, > > I am having a problem with routing on a Cisco1605 router. Ethernet0 is > set > > to 10.1.1.17 255.255.255.0 and ethernet1 is set to 10.128.52.1 > 255.255.255.0 > > My problem is: > > > > From the 10.1.1.0 network i can ping 10.1.1.17 (ethernet0) > > From the 10.1.1.0 network i can ping 10.128.52.1 (ethernet1) > > From the 10.1.1.0 network I can NOT ping 10.258.52.101 (pc on subnet) > > > > I have enabled ip routing on the router, however, nothing has changed. > > > > Can anyone please advise of the command(s) for a static route, if indeed > > this is the problem. Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 05:19:45 GMT From: "Erick B." Subject: Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340] Is the PC's default gateway set to 10.128.52.1? Also, check the PCs routing table to see if everything is ok. netstat -r - --- Craig Robertson wrote: > Sorry guys, the address of the PC is 10.128.52.101, > not "258". Nice typo > hey :-) > Thanks > ""Vance Krier"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Is the PC really 10."""258""".52.101..? > > > > V-- > > > > > > > > ""Craig Robertson"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi guys, > > > I am having a problem with routing on a > Cisco1605 router. Ethernet0 is > > set > > > to 10.1.1.17 255.255.255.0 and ethernet1 is set > to 10.128.52.1 > > 255.255.255.0 > > > My problem is: > > > > > > From the 10.1.1.0 network i can ping 10.1.1.17 > (ethernet0) > > > From the 10.1.1.0 network i can ping 10.128.52.1 > (ethernet1) > > > From the 10.1.1.0 network I can NOT ping > 10.258.52.101 (pc on subnet) > > > > > > I have enabled ip routing on the router, > however, nothing has changed. > > > > > > Can anyone please advise of the command(s) for a > static route, if indeed > > > this is the problem. Any suggestions would be > appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 05:21:46 GMT From: "Chuck's Long Road" Subject: Tonight's Homily - Other Important Things [7:52347] Not much studying today. Work was more hectic than usual. After work a special treat. I had the privilege and pleasure of meeting and spending some time with another of the Groupstudy Gang. Over the past couple of years I've met some good folks through this list. Tonight was no exception. It reinforced something I already know, and I hope that all of you know it too. This is a great list, peopled by wonderful people. I thoroughly enjoy the opportunities I have had to meet with you on line and in person. Ken, it was a pleasure. Still waters. Smooth jazz. Golden sunsets over endless forests. Goodnight. - -- www.chuckslongroad.info still a work in progress, but on line for your enjoyment z Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 05:24:45 GMT From: "Michael Greenbaum" Subject: RE: unidentified cisco cable [7:52296] I have used a Y cable for the WAN probe for watching my frame relay connections. Its possible its for that. Michael >From: "Vicuna, Mark" >Reply-To: "Vicuna, Mark" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: unidentified cisco cable [7:52296] >Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:15:32 GMT > >haha.. no i meant i saw a post from someone with the same query back in >99 :) > >I do see a reference to a y cable in the 7500 product reference manual, >never seen it in use though to be honest. > > >Thanks, >M > >-----Original Message----- >From: Brad Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, 30 August 2002 03:06 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: unidentified cisco cable [7:52296] > > >yes, if you've had the cable since 1999 and still don't know what it is, >throw it out or put it up on e-bay already! :) > >thanks, >-Brad Ellis >CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) >Network Learning Inc >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) > >""Vicuna, Mark"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi All, > > > > I've come across a cable I haven't seen before, its a cisco "Y" cable. > > One end has a DB25 female and splits into two DB25 males. The two >male > > ends have a sign that says "Console 72-1032-01" and labels that say > > "Console cisco router this end". > > > > I've seen a similar post in groupstudy back in 1999 but there was no > > reply. I've also search the cisco site but with no reference at all >to > > this cable. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Mark. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 05:26:06 GMT From: "Brad Ellis" Subject: OT: Las Vegas Cisco users group [7:52341] I've got a few requests to start a Vegas Cisco users group. If you are interested, please shoot me an e-mail off list. thanks, - -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:34:13 GMT From: "TP" Subject: switch over fax [7:52350] Group, Does anybody know if there is a standard for switch over fax in H323enviorments when G.729 coedec is available? tks Teresa Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:45:59 GMT From: "Tunji Suleiman" Subject: Re: Gatekeeper not completing calls [7:52315] Thanks Hamid, the register e164 command registered the dial-peers and successfully completed calls between the gateways. I will be using tech-prefixes, so the link to the call routing document is much appreciated. Regards. >From: "Hamid" >Reply-To: "Hamid" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Gatekeeper not completing calls [7:52315] >Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:34:21 GMT > >You have to configure the gateways so that they register the required >dial-peers with the gatekeeper. For example: > > > >Dial-peer voice 101 pots > > destination-pattern 320T > > register ---> This makes the gateway register this dial-peer with the >gatekeeper. > > Port 0/0 > > > >When the gateway is registering with the gatekeeper, it will register all >configured dial-peers (with the register command) with the GK. > > > >If you are using tech-prefixes, you can do it through tech-prefixes as >well. >Take a look at: > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voip/gk-call-routing.html > > > >Hope this helps, > >Hamid > > > >""Tunji Suleiman"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I set up two gateways with session target to each other and made calls > > between them successfully. I introduced gatekeeper and the gateways > > registered successfully to the gatekeeper, but do not complete calls. I >will > > appreciate pointers from voice gurus. Below are my configs and sh gate >end > > output. TIA. > > > > Tunji > > > > hostname VG1 > > ! > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0 > > ip address 217.197.175.25 255.255.255.224 > > speed 100 > > full-duplex > > h323-gateway voip interface > > h323-gateway voip id LOCAL-GK ipaddr 217.197.175.17 1719 > > h323-gateway voip h323-id VG1 > > ! > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 217.197.175.1 > > ! > > ! > > voice-port 0/0 > > station-id number 3201101 > > ! > > voice-port 0/1 > > station-id number 3201102 > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer voice 10 voip > > destination-pattern 420T > > session target ras > > ! > > dial-peer voice 1 pots > > destination-pattern 320T > > port 0/0 > > ! > > dial-peer voice 2 pots > > destination-pattern 320T > > port 0/1 > > ! > > gateway > > ! > > > > > > hostname VG2 > > ! > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address 217.197.175.1 255.255.255.224 > > half-duplex > > h323-gateway voip interface > > h323-gateway voip id LOCAL-GK ipaddr 217.197.175.17 1719 > > h323-gateway voip h323-id VG2 > > ! > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 > > ! > > ! > > voice-port 1/0/0 > > station-id number 4202101 > > ! > > voice-port 1/0/1 > > station-id number 4202102 > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer voice 1 voip > > destination-pattern 320T > > session target ras > > ! > > dial-peer voice 10 pots > > destination-pattern 420T > > port 1/0/0 > > ! > > dial-peer voice 20 pots > > destination-pattern 420T > > port 1/0/1 > > ! > > gateway > > ! > > > > hotname LOCAL-GK > > ! > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address 217.197.175.17 255.255.255.224 > > half-duplex > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 217.197.175.1 > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer cor custom > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > gatekeeper > > zone local LOCAL-GK mydomain.com 217.197.175.17 > > zone remote REMOTE-GK remotedomain.com 215.215.77.251 1719 > > zone prefix REMOTE-GK 009* > > zone prefix LOCAL-GK 320* gw-priority 10 VG1 > > zone prefix LOCAL-GK 420* gw-priority 10 VG2 > > lrq forward-queries > > no shutdown > > > > > > LOCAL-GK#sh gate end > > GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION > > ================================ > > CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type F > > --------------- ----- --------------- ----- --------- ---- -- > > 217.197.175.1 1720 217.197.175.1 52318 LOCAL-GK VOIP-GW > > H323-ID: VG2 > > 217.197.175.25 1720 217.197.175.25 57092 LOCAL-GK VOIP-GW > > H323-ID: VG1 > > Total number of active registrations = 2 > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com ks _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:14:19 GMT From: "bi.s" Subject: Re: unidentified cisco cable [7:52296] M.C. van den Bovenkamp wrote: > Vicuna, Mark wrote: > > >>I've come across a cable I haven't seen before, its a cisco "Y" cable. >>One end has a DB25 female and splits into two DB25 males. The two male >>ends have a sign that says "Console 72-1032-01" and labels that say >>"Console cisco router this end". > > > Might be a 7500 console cable (for redundant RSPs): > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7505/rte_swit/rsp4/2662rsp4.htm#xtocid34 > > Regards, > > Marco. > > hi, he's right. you connect it to a c7500 with dual RSP boards. one of the boards is master and active and the otherone is the slave and has not booted. so if you want console access all the time to your c7500, you use this y-cable because it always connects you to the active RSP (e.g for a console server) hth - -bis Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 11:22:16 GMT From: "Valiente, Rafael" Subject: new examine CCIE R&S [7:52355] Hello Somebody knows how are the questions with multiple answers in new CCIE R&S exam? In the old simply say that the question is a multiple answers, but it does not indicate how many you must choose. Is this true also in the new one? Thanks ********************************************** Noticia legal Este mensaje electrsnico contiene informacisn de BT Ignite Espaqa S.A.U. que es privada y confidencial, siendo para el uso exclusivo de la persona (s) o entidades arriba mencionadas. Si usted no es el destinatario seqalado, le informamos que cualquier divulgacisn, copia, distribucisn o uso de los contenidos esta prohibida. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor borre su contenido lo antes posible. Gracias. Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:25:11 GMT From: "Andrey Rotach" Subject: Re: FXS and Key System connection [7:52288] You can connect FXS module to key system. FXS looks like analog phone for the key system. You need configure the key system port for analog phone operation mode. Best regards, Andrey neil K. wrote: > Hi Group, > > Could anyone please tell me is there a way to connect FXS to Key system, I > was thinking that it can only be used to connect to an Analog phone or Fax, > but I have heard there is a way to connect it to Key system, I guess in that > case some programming might be needed in Key System. === message truncated === --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52529&t=52529 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
