RE: route summarization question [7:19970]

2001-09-14 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Cisco wrong? Perish the thought!!! ;- seeing as 134 is 1110, and is in no way relevant here, I would suggest that the lazy no good subcontractor that Cisco hired to write / proof / tech review / whatever is wrong. welcome to the world of study materials. best wishes Chuck -Original

RE: route summarization question [7:19970]

2001-09-14 Thread Chuck Larrieu
, September 14, 2001 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: route summarization question [7:19970] Cisco wrong? Perish the thought!!! ;- seeing as 134 is 1110, and is in no way relevant here, I would suggest that the lazy no good subcontractor that Cisco hired to write / proof / tech

RE: route summarization question [7:19970]

2001-09-14 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: route summarization question [7:19970] Cisco wrong? Perish the thought!!! ;- seeing as 134 is 1110, and is in no way relevant here, I would suggest that the lazy no good subcontractor that Cisco hired to write / proof / tech review / whatever is wrong

Re: route summarization question [7:19970]

2001-09-14 Thread EA Louie
cat's outta da bag now. but i'm sure your name will be there (Technical Editor, Chuck Larrieu, CCIE 82**) on the front of every text. ;-) -e- - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:11 AM Subject: RE: route summarization question [7:19970