vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Farhan Ahmed
lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a 64k connection to internet > what would be the speed of the tunnel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13499&t=13499 -- FAQ, list archives, and s

Re: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Allen May
t: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM Subject: vpn speed [7:13499] > lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a 64k > connection to internet > > what would be the speed of the tunnel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.p

Re: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Allen May
t;Patrick Ramsey" To: ; Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:57 AM Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499] > I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the throughput will only be 64k. Regardl

Re: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Patrick Ramsey
To: Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM Subject: vpn speed [7:13499] > lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a 64k > connection to internet > > what would be the speed of the tunnel Message Posted at: http

RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Chuck Larrieu
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Farhan Ahmed Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: vpn speed [7:13499] lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a 64k connection to internet > w

RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499] I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the throughput will only be 64k. Regardless of compression/and or vpn acceleration. -Pa

RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Patrick Ramsey
yloads. /me hangs his head in dissapointment -Peter -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499] I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you ar

RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Ayers, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: vpn speed [7:13499] correct me if im wrong, but encryption and compression are COMPLETELY different, and in most cases, encryption results in LARGER payloads. /me hangs his head in

RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Ayers, Michael
9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: vpn speed [7:13499] Most definately and across 64k, damn near struggling... I can only hope the vpn is used for telnet... :) >>> Peter Slow 07/24/01 11:53AM >>> correct me if im wrong, but encryption and compression are

RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Stephen Skinner
th is out there"...STOP THE SERIES...IT`S NOT THE SAME WITHOUT THEM steve "who`s that behind me " skinner >From: "Chuck Larrieu" >Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: vpn speed [7:13499] >Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001