On Thu, Apr 05, 2007, Alex Campbell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking at putting two 3560Gs in front of a couple of servers in a
> high-availability configuration, and hoping that someone who has tried a
> similar setup could provide some guidance. A rough diagram of the
> approach I'm consider
Hi all,
I'm looking at putting two 3560Gs in front of a couple of servers in a
high-availability configuration, and hoping that someone who has tried a
similar setup could provide some guidance. A rough diagram of the
approach I'm considering is here
http://alexjcampbell.com/3560g_diagram.gif.
Hey Everyone -
I am looking for specific warranty information on Cisco 6500 series
switches and modules. I looked all over the Cisco website and even
downloaded the very nice 60 page "Cisco Catalyst Switch Guide" which
interesting enough shows the warranty info for the smaller switches, but
not t
Bruce Pinsky wrote:
> Dan wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > Diagram:
> >
> http://bp0.blogger.com/_ZwoccirELZg/RhPQ4QRWSEI/AAM/JnXNbHL_PQs/s1600-h/routing+question.jpg
>
> > I have all of my 3550's & 3560's running ospf and the 2950's & 2960's
> > trunking to the 3550's and 3560's. I would like for
Greetings all,
I'd like to hire a part-time network admin for some 7609s / 15454s,
but don't know where to advertise. I assume this list isn't a
suitable forum, but would be grateful if someone could point me in the
right direction.
Also, could someone tell me how to find out how much I'm likely
www.google.com? Sorry, couldn't resist.
http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/EEM?page=main
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Kemp
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:58 AM
> To: Rodney Dunn
> Cc: cisco-nsp@pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerry Kemp wrote:
> What is Cisco Beyond? Do you have a URL?
>
http://cisco.com/go/ciscobeyond
http://cisco.com/go/eem
- --
=
bep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://en
What is Cisco Beyond? Do you have a URL?
Jerry
Rodney Dunn wrote:
> Post it on Cisco Beyond if you get it to work for others to use.
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:34:38PM -0400, fonesurj wrote:
>>
>> Duh is right. I know TCL a tiny bit, I could hammer that out!
>>
>> - Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Diagram:
> http://bp0.blogger.com/_ZwoccirELZg/RhPQ4QRWSEI/AAM/JnXNbHL_PQs/s1600-h/routing+question.jpg
>
> I have all of my 3550's & 3560's running ospf and the 2950's & 2960's
> trunking to the 3550's and 3560's. I
Post it on Cisco Beyond if you get it to work for others to use.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:34:38PM -0400, fonesurj wrote:
>
>
> Duh is right. I know TCL a tiny bit, I could hammer that out!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rodney Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "fonesurj" <[EMAIL PR
Duh...
I forgot.
You can do it today.
Learn EEM and TCL.
Check 'sh arp' output. Look for your entry.
If it's not there change the route.
Trigger another script to watch for the arp to come back.
When it does add the route back.
Rodney
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:25:31PM -0400, Rodney Dunn w
Duh is right. I know TCL a tiny bit, I could hammer that out!
- Original Message -
From: "Rodney Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "fonesurj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Static route withdrawal / tracking arp
> Duh...
>
> I forgot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Stewart wrote:
> Thanks.. yes, I believe this would work but kind of messy ;) I'm trying to
> find a way to set costs based on source/destination of IP addresses I guess
> you could say never done route-maps in OSPF - is it basically same as
An arp entry doesn't guarantee transit forwarding.
It can lead to a blackhole scenario.
So it depends on what level of failover you want.
Your request has validity. But given the other variants available
to solve the problem it's very unlikely anyone would code it.
Rodney
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007
Thanks bep and everyone for the feedback... I'm up for the challenge ;)
We're going to install a 3640 there in the next couple of weeks that won't
be put into production right away - then I can work on actual config which
will probably make this easier..
All the best,
Paul
-Original Messa
Yes indeed, this is what is on the table at the moment.
I was originally just wishing there was a way to do it on arp so that it
wouldn't require our vendor/customer/whoever to add any additional
configuration and thus engage their change management process and all of
that administrative overhe
Hello,
Diagram:
http://bp0.blogger.com/_ZwoccirELZg/RhPQ4QRWSEI/AAM/JnXNbHL_PQs/s1600-h/routing+question.jpg
I have all of my 3550's & 3560's running ospf and the 2950's & 2960's
trunking to the 3550's and 3560's. I would like for location 2960-14 to
get its internet from Internet West
So track something that is through the Firewall. Create a static host route
to the router on the other side of the firewall. You don't want your ping to
start working again, unless the firewall is working again.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122
t/122t15/
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:53:54AM -0400, fonesurj wrote:
> Can't ping the outside interface of the firewall.
Ping throught it or one of the other services through the
firewall. If it's no up they will not work either. Use
any one of those services available in IP SLA and hook a track
object to it
Can't ping the outside interface of the firewall.
I'm not seeing where the functionality required is available.
- Original Message -
From: "Rodney Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "fonesurj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Static route
Hello,
We're in need of providing redundant links that will also be VPLS
endpoints to some BLC equipment. The BLC equipment does not support
spanning-tree, but it can pass spanning-tree BPDUs. For a simple
solution, I was thinking Flex Links may work. Unfortunately, we don't
have any gear to lab wi
You can get the same type thing with Object tracking of static routes.
Search for it on CCO.
You can monitor the state of the FW and have the route adjusted accordingly.
Rodney
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:57:06AM -0400, fonesurj wrote:
> I have a router connected to a switch on Fa0/0. I have a
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:46:27PM +0100, Sam Stickland wrote:
> > I've run some testing, and different Cisco platforms update the
> > SNMP-viewable
> > counters at different intervals.
[..]
> Thanks Gert, this is very helpful. I'm guessing then that there isn't
> any offical cisco documenta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:53 PM:
> I have a situation where I need to provide a customer with an L3 MPLS
> VPN (2 sites) and Internet access at each location. I need separate
> (SNMP) counters for the Internet access from the VPN so as to be able
> to bill for usage d
I have a router connected to a switch on Fa0/0. I have a static route pointing
to another company's firewall that is out that interface.
That static route won't go away if the firewall takes a poop and the switch
does not.
So wouldn't it be sweet if we could withdraw the static route if the fi
Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:17:06PM +0100, Sam Stickland wrote:
>
>> Can anyone answer this question from a college of mine?
>>
>> "Afternoon all. Does anyone know anything about the minimum poll period
>> for an OID on a Cisco box? For example, I'm polling a 6500 f
If you are seeing that same problem open a TAC case because
that bug was fixed in 12.2(18)SXF7 and should not exist on SXF8.
Rodney
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:12:50PM +0400, Shefer Yuri wrote:
> Hi, cisco-nsp.
>
> I have a problem with my 6500.
> In BugTool this bug have id CSCse63054:
>
> Symp
If you hit a bug we will not fix it.
If most of your work is control plane it doesn't buy you anything
becuase it's all punted.
If it's just raw IP with no features then leave it on as you will
get better forwarding performance. If you start a bunch of fancy
features and start seeing odd things tu
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:49:44PM +0800, Roy wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 15:34 -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> > And turn off PXF.
>
> any particular reason?
The impolite answer is that the PXF had huge collateral damage
and caused all sorts of problems. While they tried to fix it, it be
Hi, cisco-nsp.
I have a problem with my 6500.
In BugTool this bug have id CSCse63054:
Symptom:
Data traffic destined for a VRF was dropped or forwarded to a different
VRF.
Conditions:
A software IDB structure was used for the reserved VLAN of a VRF.
The reserved VLAN was later on released. The I
Thanks.. yes, I believe this would work but kind of messy ;) I'm trying to
find a way to set costs based on source/destination of IP addresses I guess
you could say never done route-maps in OSPF - is it basically same as
BGP route-maps work?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: virendra r
Romeo,
On 4/4/07, Bagosi Rómeó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The link doesn't helped:(
>
> Does these errors affect the network performance?
Yes.
Christian already mentioned it, but have you tried:
int gi0/21
media-type sfp
Then try changing the speed and duplex (to 100-full):
speed 100
dup
The link doesn't helped:(
Does these errors affect the network performance?
-Original Message-
From: Hank Nussbacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:29 PM
To: Bagosi Rómeó
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] %LINK-4-ERROR and %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMAT
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:17:06PM +0100, Sam Stickland wrote:
> Can anyone answer this question from a college of mine?
>
> "Afternoon all. Does anyone know anything about the minimum poll period
> for an OID on a Cisco box? For example, I'm polling a 6500 for the in
> and out octets for a
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:37:20PM -0400, Chris Griffin wrote:
> Hi all,
> We are thinking about switching to DOM based SFPs and are experimenting
> with them. So far we have found them to work ok with:
>
> 3750 with SEE2 code.
> 3750me with 12.2.35SE2 code (SEG gave bad RX values).
> 6509
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 15:34 -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> And turn off PXF.
any particular reason?
roy
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/ci
36 matches
Mail list logo
