To start with you have to upgrade to 256MB of RAM on both the SP and RP to
support 12.2(18)SXF on the Sup2.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/122sx/ol_4164.ht
m#wp2561255
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailt
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Bryan wrote:
> - Greetings all, trying to upgrade the IOS on a SUP2/MSFC2 which is
> already in native move at 12.1(27b)E and trying to upgrade to 12.2.18
> but I keep seeing similar errors to this:
>
> - I uploaded the image to disk0: and set the following:
>
> boot system fla
Phil Bedard wrote:
> Your answers mean that the LAN-type GigE on the 7600 series
> is probably not what you want.
> Some of those cards are oversubscribed (IE, there are 24 GigE
> ports handled by 2 10-gig ASICs.) and they don't do shaping.
>
> While it's very new, the ES20 20-port GigE blade fo
- Greetings all, trying to upgrade the IOS on a SUP2/MSFC2 which is
already in native move at 12.1(27b)E and trying to upgrade to 12.2.18
but I keep seeing similar errors to this:
- I uploaded the image to disk0: and set the following:
boot system flash disk0:s222-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.
Hjan wrote:
> Justin Shore ha scritto:
>
> > Has anyone deployed FTTH with Cisco equipment? Can anyone
> > point me a page on Cisco's site that will point me to
> > Cisco's FTTH product line?
>
> Yes ;)
>
> Metro ethernet:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns577/networking_solutions_s
> olu
Hi Jon,
I also posted about this awhile ago, and it turned out to be the conf
register. Once we changed it, it worked fine.
In our case, it would not boot from the sup addon flash, which was a bit
of a bummer since we needed to use an IOS image that was larger than 64 meg.
A work mate found th
Kamal,
Also, it looks like your RP rommon is not set correctly and SP/RP DUALCON
(ie dualconsole mode..) is set. You probably got this as a demo unit from
someone in Cisco, and they probably din't clean all this up.
>From the SP-rommon do this:
priv
unset DUALCON
sync
Then try booting again.
That looks bad. I would add the one you have already a second time.
Did a quick search and found this
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_tech_note0918
6a00803e5282.shtml
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EM
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Church, Charles wrote:
> Do you have a boot system command in the running config? If you put one
> in and 'wri mem', that should get pushed down to the SP as well:
>
> boot system flash disk0:s222-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF6.bin
>
> Router#rem com sw sh boot
>
> BOOT va
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Jon Lewis wrote:
> The config-register on the supervisor (as shown by rem com sw sh ver) is
> 0x2142. On all our other 6500s, both the msfc and sup conf-regs are
> 0x2102. How do you change the conf-reg on the supervisor? Is it as
> simple as
> rem com sw conf t
> conf-reg 0
Do you have a boot system command in the running config? If you put one
in and 'wri mem', that should get pushed down to the SP as well:
boot system flash disk0:s222-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF6.bin
Router#rem com sw sh boot
BOOT variable = disk0:s222-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF6.b
Justin Shore ha scritto:
> Has anyone deployed FTTH with Cisco equipment? Can anyone point me a
> page on Cisco's site that will point me to Cisco's FTTH product line?
Yes ;)
Metro ethernet:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns577/networking_solutions_solution.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/p
That's it. I can't find my notes on this one. I think this was mentioned
here previously as well.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 3:59 PM
> To: David Prall
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.ne
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Church, Charles wrote:
> Do a 'conf-reg 0x2102' from the normal CLI. Then do a 'wri mem'. The
> wri mem should push the config register setting down to the switch side.
> The remote command method you listed won't work, since it's a one-line
> command only. Do a 'show boot'
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, David Prall wrote:
> You just set the config register, then confirm with the remote commands.
> Some where in the mix it didn't synchronize between the two. Had this
> problem on a 6500, spent 4 hours trying to figure out why it was happening.
> I now confirm and verify.
ok...
Do a 'conf-reg 0x2102' from the normal CLI. Then do a 'wri mem'. The
wri mem should push the config register setting down to the switch side.
The remote command method you listed won't work, since it's a one-line
command only. Do a 'show boot' and 'rem comm sw sh boot' when done to
verify.
Chuc
You just set the config register, then confirm with the remote commands.
Some where in the mix it didn't synchronize between the two. Had this
problem on a 6500, spent 4 hours trying to figure out why it was happening.
I now confirm and verify.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -Original
Several months ago, I posted about a 6509/sup7203bxl we have that won't
boot properly without manual help (being told to boot from the rom-mon
prompt, or fails-back to booting from sup-bootflash...depending on what
rom-mon code we use (upgraded to latest falls back to whatever is in
sup-bootfla
We're looking at options to setup a departmental lab with a couple local
servers and some high-end desktops, and trying to match a nice, smoking switch
to handle the traffic.
6500 is out of the question :-)
4948 is pushing it, but would clearly provide 48-ports full-duplex gigabit
non-blocking
I ran into a situation where members of an OSPF area all saw a (pair of)
neighbors up, but those routers didn't show any of the other area members
up. Unable to ping to the weird routers.
Several Cisco 7500s and Cat5500/multi-RSM routers in the area. VLAN 2 and
3 (on different physical links a
Hi all
Can someone easily break down for me the differences between the DG and non
DG version? What does that extra diagnostic feature by in exchange for the
fewer IOS options available?
Thank you
Scott
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.net
More generically, whatever version you specify in the mls nde sender
CLI is completely overridden when you enter the ip flow-export
version 9 CLI (intuitive, I know), and both the h/w & s/w flows will
export in v9 format.
tstevens-6509e(config)#mls nde send ver 5
tstevens-6509e(config)#do sh ml
At 12:00 PM 6/6/2007 -0400, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
>MLS has no commands to enable version 9. CISCO states that you do not
>use MLS for version 9. Does that mean I cannot get hardware switches
>flows for version 9? Maybe I should use version 5 which is supported
>in MLS.
Enable version 5 for mls
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:57:39PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At 05:00 AM 07-06-07 -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> >Also depends if you have the priority set and who came up first.
>
> From the OSPF Design Guide:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/104/1.html
>
> "DR and BDR election is done v
Also, are we sure that you are booting a Sup32-PISA here, and not just a
Sup32/MSFC2C?
Kamal, can you contact me offline?
sukumar
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> Kamal,
>
> string is bootdisk:s32p3-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.V122_18_ZY_THROTTLE_070425
>
> That looks like some datecode im
Ian MacKinnon wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 02:50:14PM +0100, Ian MacKinnon wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Given the config below for a vpn tunnel, when I add the command "qos
>>> pre-classify" to the crypto map and the tunnel interface, I get really
>>> bad slowdown of traffic.
>>>
>>> 2. Qu
Rodney Dunn wrote:
> True. The only drawback of that is that only applies to TCP so
> your udp still has the issue.
>
> Personally, if I were designing it and had a way to force
> all my workstations down I would strongly consider it if their
> main data transport is over some form of tunneled inf
True. The only drawback of that is that only applies to TCP so
your udp still has the issue.
Personally, if I were designing it and had a way to force
all my workstations down I would strongly consider it if their
main data transport is over some form of tunneled infrastructure.
The performance l
It's not available yet, target is the "whitney 1" release.
Tim
At 02:17 PM 6/7/2007 +0200, Rutger Bevaart opined:
>Hello list,
>
>On a sup32 running s3223-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin I am unable
>to configure md5 authentication HSRP for VLAN interfaces...
>
>On a 3560 I am able to (under
Hi,
Software Version: 12.2(18)SXF7
Problem Details: BGP peer is flapping only one way. The other way is ok. ping
with small and big packet size are all ok from peer loopbacks and connected
vlan interfaces. show ip bgp neighbor showed that keepalives are temporarily in
throttle due to closed TCP
It is advisable that you change the MSS value on the interface that
connects to the segment with your workstations. This is usually the
recommended way to achieve this.
On the interface:
ip tcp adjust-mss 1200
This is assuming an IOS based device. If you have a PIX/ASA, you must
use the equivale
Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
> Does that sound good to you? Anybody ever tried this? Can you think of any
> side effect of changing the MTU of all PCs?
A lot of people have to do something similar when using PPPoE, which
uses an MTU of 1492.
You also have the option of activating MSS-Clamping on the
Rodney Dunn wrote:
> What exactly are you trying to accomplish with this configuration?
>
IPSec tunnel between 2 sites over shared infrastructure.
> What type of box is this on? I ask because there are some hooks
> to QOS for the HW crypto engines for LLQ.
1812 running 12.4(11)T2
>
> I have no
Hello list,
our company is about to build a corporate European network over VPNs, and a
colleague of mine read somewhere that VPN performance can be improved by
changing the MTU of workstations (this seems to be an option of DHCP
server). In this way, the encapsulated packets are not bigger tha
What exactly are you trying to accomplish with this configuration?
What type of box is this on? I ask because there are some hooks
to QOS for the HW crypto engines for LLQ.
I have no idea what impact it would have for your scenario
with shaping on the tunnel.
What we really recommend is to have
Hi All,
Given the config below for a vpn tunnel, when I add the command "qos
pre-classify" to the crypto map and the tunnel interface, I get really
bad slowdown of traffic.
2. Questions, is anybody using qos pre-classify to prioritise voice?
And I just wonder if trying to shape the tunnel and sha
Have a look at BGP Conditional Advertisements, e.g. have your router drop
the advertised routes to external peers if your internal connection is
gone...
see: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/cond_adv.html
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards,
Rutger Bevaart
__
Your answers mean that the LAN-type GigE on the 7600 series is
probably not
what you want. Some of those cards are oversubscribed (IE, there
are 24 GigE ports
handled by 2 10-gig ASICs.) and they don't do shaping.
While it's very new, the ES20 20-port GigE blade for the 7600 I think
is the
Hello list,
On a sup32 running s3223-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9.bin I am unable
to configure md5 authentication HSRP for VLAN interfaces...
On a 3560 I am able to (under interface configuration) do:
"standby 1 authentication md5 key-string 7 "
I checked with sup32 and sup720's, and it does
Hi everyone. I'm trying to find a way to rate-limit or police to 3Mbps
two of the switch ports on an 1811 router. I have configured both FE
ports as follows:
interface FastEthernet2
switchport access vlan 10
load-interval 30
!
interface FastEthernet9
switchport access vlan 10
load-interval 30
That does not look right.
Can you get 'debug ip os adj' and flap the vlan 50
on either A or C?
Before you do it get: sh ip os int vlan 50 on both
Rodney
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:57:39PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At 05:00 AM 07-06-07 -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> >Also depends if you have
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:41:40AM -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
> To add to Zahid's question with a question of my own, does anyone have
> any OIDs for monitoring TCAM usage via SNMP? I have a pair of 3BXLs
> with full tables that I'd like to keep an eye on.
A walk of .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.97.1.9 on S
Sorry, I havent copied this to Mailing list.
I got location of image through rodney, I will try it and let you know the
results.
Best regards
Kamal
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kamal Dissanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jun 7, 2007 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Sup 32 PISA not b
At 05:00 AM 07-06-07 -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>Also depends if you have the priority set and who came up first.
From the OSPF Design Guide:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/104/1.html
"DR and BDR election is done via the Hello protocol. Hello packets are
exchanged via IP multicast packets (Ap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>> I think you have missed some important factors:
>>
>> Do you need totally non-overbooked linecards?
>>
I'm not sure to understand exactly what you mean, but we expect to use
all the interfaces near their max capacity
>> What are your QoS requirements, will LAN
At 11:48 AM 07-06-07 +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
PNG did not make it thru so you can find it here:
http://www.interall.co.il/vlans.png
Thanks,
Hank
>What causes a router to become a Designated Router (DR) on a VLAN? I
>always thought highest router-id, but I have a few test routers and here
Also depends if you have the priority set and who came up first.
What is the uptime of C?
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:48:52AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> What causes a router to become a Designated Router (DR) on a VLAN? I
> always thought highest router-id, but I have a few test routers and
What causes a router to become a Designated Router (DR) on a VLAN? I
always thought highest router-id, but I have a few test routers and here is
what I get:
C#sho ip ospf nei
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
192.168.1.1 1 FULL/DR 00:0
Kamal,
string is bootdisk:s32p3-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.V122_18_ZY_THROTTLE_070425
That looks like some datecode image on a throttle. I can't find it
so I couldn't try to decode the crash.
Can you try the 12.2(18)ZY that is on CCO or is your image one given
to you after that?
Rodney
O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
does anyone have a clue about when a
gige link on a 3508 becomes saturated? Once
the throughput gets to about 650Mbps TX
and roughly 280Mbps RX, there are lots of
output buffer failures and underruns
showing up 'show int gig 0/2'.
- From wha
50 matches
Mail list logo
