> Anything that used ACLs was suspect. The L2 support was very weak. We were
> so impressed with the 2948G-L3, we took them out of service, put them in store
> until they'd depreciated, and then put them in the bin. I'm not sure I can
> think of a configuration that isn't inherently flawed in so
Greetings,
I'm in search or recommendations for 10G linecard options for our 7600s
(current chassis have Sup720-3BXL but all new chassis have 3CXLs and old
one will be eventually replaced). These ports will be used for backbone
links between other 7600 chassis in a MPLS cloud supporting a
tri
I'll second the negative report on the 2948G-L3. I've ran into one
(actually a 2980G-L3) in the field and it managed to create a routing
loop using two interfaces *that were both running OSPF*. No, I'm not
kidding, I got access to another one later and could reproduce the
problem - it was a tot
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007, Frank Bulk wrote:
> How do people sustain 4 Mbps? I'm no gamer, but that seems a bit on the
> high side.
P2P and filesharing on a LAN can actually max out provided port bandwidth.
One of the LAN parties I went to actually provided gigabit ethernet to
a bunch of people (via y
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Plenty of bugs. *Especially* if you actually tried to use them for L2.
>>The 2948G-L3 is dead, and deservedly so.
>
> Ok, what sort of bugs have people experienced with these? I say this because
> I have three, and if there
On Saturday 23 June 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Plenty of bugs. *Especially* if you actually tried to use them for L2.
> The 2948G-L3 is dead, and deservedly so.
Ok, what sort of bugs have people experienced with these? I say this because
I have three, and if there are configurations that t
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Frank Bulk wrote:
> How do people sustain 4 Mbps? I'm no gamer, but that seems a bit on the
> high side.
File transfers.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
http
> I was not even aware the 85xx had some 'sibling', but seems to be the case.
> Does anyone has a table describing what switches use which NPUs or ASICs
> 'off the shelf' or not ? I understand all 65xx PFC/DFCs is EARL (or the
> son/grandson of EARL), that was born in-house. Anything in the LAN s
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2007, Ian Dickinson wrote:
>> [The 2948G-L3] really was meant to be an L3 device - You had to do BVI's to
>> put a vlan on multiple ports. The FE ports couldn't do ACLs - You had
>> a 'special command' to force traffic to route out of the GE port and back
>>
> > [The 2948G-L3] really was meant to be an L3 device - You had to do BVI's to
> > put a vlan on multiple ports. The FE ports couldn't do ACLs - You had
> > a 'special command' to force traffic to route out of the GE port and back
> > again to apply ACLs there.
>
> Right. It was somewhat like
On Saturday 23 June 2007, Ian Dickinson wrote:
> [The 2948G-L3] really was meant to be an L3 device - You had to do BVI's to
> put a vlan on multiple ports. The FE ports couldn't do ACLs - You had
> a 'special command' to force traffic to route out of the GE port and back
> again to apply ACLs the
Hello,
I need to create a trunk between two of my 3550 switches which are
interconnected over my isp's network. I can establish the trunk but I
cannot get any ip information across the trunk. I have many other
trunks setup but this is the only one I have across someone else's
network. Here
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:25:28PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
>>
>>>Wasn't the 2948G the odd one that could do L3, but only the uplinks?
>>
>>That was the 2948G-L3, which was EOLed very quickly, and deserved so.
>
>
> I'd be cur
How do people sustain 4 Mbps? I'm no gamer, but that seems a bit on the
high side.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 9:21 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] advice f
On Saturday 23 June 2007, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
> A pair of Cisco 5513s should get you to the number of ports and do it on
> the cheap on the used market. They do have Layer 4 filtering features,
> but what I don't know is whether you need the Route Switch Module + IOS
> to use them.
Either Supe
On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:25:28PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
> > Wasn't the 2948G the odd one that could do L3, but only the uplinks?
>
> That was the 2948G-L3, which was EOLed very quickly, and deserved so.
I'd be curious as to why.
--
Lamar Owen
Ch
I second a pair of used 6500 chassis with used sup1a/msfc(1) and cheap
used 6348 blades. Were you near someone who keeps spares you could
probably borrow or rent a lot of it, much easier to setup with just 2
chassis than 40 or so smaller switches. I'm betting you could get it
all on the gray
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Jason LeBlanc wrote:
> This may be a dumb question, but why not wifi? If its laptops, most
> will have the adapter built in, and a few usb adapters on the cheap for
> the rest, and a few ethernet ports for those that really need copper.
At the 5k people lanparties the aggr
Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> I can't see how the idea below saves you anything from just shutting
> down the session. You still incur a CPU hit when you withdraw all
> your routes by no longer receiving them from the upstream, and the
> internet still recalculates if you change the local preferenc
Justin Shore wrote:
> "ip fast-convergence" isn't an option on our 7600s.
Try "fast-flood" instead of "ip fast-convergence" - I believe they are related
if not identical. Other optimisations/tweaks that you may find worth
investigating are 'ispf', 'ip route priority high tag' and 'external overlo
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Kevin Blackham wrote:
> We're promoting a one day event that requires around 500 FE access ports. I
> need to filter at layer 4 (block DHCP serving) and perform some QoS duties
Sounds like a classical lan-party setup. I've done this but with 4500
ports.
People do this with
In the past when I have had events like this depending on the profile
Cisco certainly provided demo kit. Maybe talk to the local account
team they can usually get you demo kit for ~30 days loan.
Regards
Kevin
On 6/23/07, Sridhar Ayengar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kevin Blackham wrote:
> > Did
22 matches
Mail list logo
