Thanks for the input ... due to the fact that things like the scp, or
even netconf, would require setting up a working network config first, I
stuck with hacking up a little expect script, which now does:
- initial console login
- configuring vlan1
- retrieving the router config via tftp to star
How do I resolve this?
acs4-con-mb#sh interfaces ATM1/0
ATM1/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is ENHANCED ATM PA
Description: Bell ATM Cloud
MTU 4470 bytes, sub MTU 4470, BW 149760 Kbit, DLY 80 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 122/255, rxload 74/255
Encapsulation ATM, loopback n
I asked about a year and a half ago to have this implemented, but I
don't believe it's made it in yet.
Dave
Bernard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to get the arp table from the fwsm (using mainly Cisco
> Firewall Services Module Version 3.2(1)) through snmp.
> The device is manageable through
Hi,
Is it possible to get the arp table from the fwsm (using mainly Cisco
Firewall Services Module Version 3.2(1)) through snmp.
The device is manageable through snmp (interface status, load, system
info etc) however when I try to get the arp table through snmp with
snmpwalk I don't get any
I will be out of the office starting Fri 06/29/2007 and will not return
until Mon 07/09/2007.
I will be out of the office beginning June 29 thru July 9th. Should you
need immediate assistance during this time please contact Joe Smith at
978.686.2255 (3517) or call HelpDesk at 978.686.2255 (4357)
You could technically trick the router by using the local-as command but
that is probably not what you are going for. If you are multi-homed you
should probably be applying for your own AS.
Could you be mores specfic with what your goals are?
On 7/3/07 2:07 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
In previous posts I asked about a way to 'mirror' or intercept a PPPoE
session. It seems the consensus was this wasn't really possibly without
utilising the lawful intercept features available in IOS.
Further questions on this topic:
1) The LI feature-set - latest 12.4T has:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 06:32:16PM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2007-07-04 15:44 +0100), Stephen Wilcox wrote:
>
> > I take it you mean unicast frames with mac addresses that are currently
> > unknown to the switch on that port? In which case you cant limit it that
> > way.. but you have two op
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 06:37:26PM +0400, alexey wrote:
> Hm...
> Not for MSFC, because comand guide recommends to configure cef...
> By the way, may be you try evidently configure cef on interface! :)
It is default configuration :) Any way here is output:
7600-RSP720#conf t
Enter con
On Wed, July 4, 2007 3:29 pm, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> I am in the process of reworking/migrating some of our existing
> infrastructure - and working with tagged MPLS and VLAN traffic in this
> sort of config is certainly something I expect I will doing real soon.
>
> In our situation we have 4 72
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:18:14AM -0400, Phil Bedard wrote:
> It is only supported on the RSP720/MSFC4/SRB afaik. You can get
> netflow stats for L2-switched traffic, I think "ip flow l2-switched
> vlan xxx."
> Have you tried not having both ingress and egress on the same
> inter
On (2007-07-04 15:44 +0100), Stephen Wilcox wrote:
> I take it you mean unicast frames with mac addresses that are currently
> unknown to the switch on that port? In which case you cant limit it that
> way.. but you have two options:
In risk of repeating myself, you can rate-limit them on PFC3C
Hey guys,
I have a situation where I have some dot1q trunks coming in one
trunk and going out another. I would like to somehow limit the speed that
these dot1q VLAN's are able to do on an individual VLAN basis.
The equipment I want to do this on is a 3560G (Enhanced). I would
al
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:37:11PM +0200, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
> > Hi Vincent,
> > I'm saying it works just fine but the implementation is sucky. I use it
> > extensively but you just need to set your thresholds pretty high to make
> > sure they arent tripped. I also usually have it just filte
I will be out of the office starting 29-06-2007 and will not return until
09-07-2007.
I will respond to your message when I return.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at htt
Found this module 5 min ago :-)
The HWIC-1GE-SFC was expensive and suddenly I stumbled over
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5853/products_data_sheet0900aecd80581fe6.html
which would be a great alternative. It's supported since Cisco IOS
12.4(11)XJ so i guess it's pretty new. In my 2821 on
Hm...
Not for MSFC, because comand guide recommends to configure cef...
By the way, may be you try evidently configure cef on interface! :)
2007/7/4, Dmitry Kiselev < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:35:31PM +0400, alexey wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> > Dmitry, where have you
> Hi Vincent,
> I'm saying it works just fine but the implementation is sucky. I use it
> extensively but you just need to set your thresholds pretty high to make
> sure they arent tripped. I also usually have it just filter rather than
> shut the port that way it will auto-recover.
>
> As to wha
Hello,
There is a bug in cisco IOS 12.2(33) SRA1-3 (CSCsh69601).
Workaround: Upgrade to SRA4.
On 6/21/07, talex < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> After upgradeing the IOS version to 12.2(33)SRA3 on C7613 Sup720, i've
> noticed
> some errors in the result returned by the snmp OID
> ifHCO
Hm...
Not for MSFC only, because comand guide recommends to configure cef...
By the way, may be you try evidently configure cef on interface :)
2007/7/4, Dmitry Kiselev < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:35:31PM +0400, alexey wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> > Dmitry, where have
Tim Franklin wrote:
> On Wed, July 4, 2007 10:24 am, Code Monkey wrote:
>
>> Back in 2003 I failed miserably at configuring two 7206 VXR so that
>> their FE interfaces could be connected to a VLAN switch, running MPLS
>> in one VLAN and non-MPLS in other VLANs.
>
> I've done this in a previous li
Get your ISP to provision a /30 between them and your 2800. Then
have them statically route the /25 to your end of the /30, then on
your router you can do whatever you want with the /25. Assign it to
an interface, subnet it further, whatever.
On 4-Jul-07, at 10:20 AM, Gary Roberton wrote:
Hi
I have a 'raw' internet feed from my ISP who has also allocated a /25
address space. My ISP is using the first address for thier kit and I have
the next address on my 2801 f0/0 interface. I want to place a firewall on
f0/1 so would normally use ip unnumbered but you cannot have this on an
eth
It is only supported on the RSP720/MSFC4/SRB afaik. You can get
netflow stats for L2-switched traffic, I think "ip flow l2-switched
vlan xxx."
Have you tried not having both ingress and egress on the same
interface at the same time? I know that it won't create flows for
traffic originat
On 7/4/07, Matthew Kirkland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Code Monkey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Back in 2003 I failed miserably at configuring two 7206 VXR so that
> > their FE interfaces could be connected to a VLAN switch, running MPLS
> > in one VLAN and non-MPLS in other VLANs.
>
> We run this quit
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:35:31PM +0400, alexey wrote:
> Hello!
> Dmitry, where have you find anything about egress NetFlow on 7600? :)
> I am reading config guide attentively
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080699369.html#
16 VLANs... Hmm, looking a bit further into the future, it might be a
good idea to buy a NM-16ESW instead? Also supported by my 2821, I could
use this module, would have enough ports, could use the Catalyst
somewhere else and follow Paul's suggestion to do a
interface FastEthernet4
switchport mode
Hi Mack,
"Total output drops" from sh int and "sh queueing int" are
interesting (and they seem to correspond), but I'm not certain if this only
shows packets dropped by the RP (though IIRC it's a hardware counter). The
"sh int switching" hidden command usually provides plenty of info,
Hello!
Dmitry, where have you find anything about egress NetFlow on 7600? :)
I am reading config guide attentively
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080699369.html#wp1078217
but no nothing about egress netflow!
2007/7/4, Dmitry Kiselev
Hi Vincent,
I'm saying it works just fine but the implementation is sucky. I use it
extensively but you just need to set your thresholds pretty high to make sure
they arent tripped. I also usually have it just filter rather than shut the
port that way it will auto-recover.
As to what 'pretty h
the HWIC-4ESW have support for max.16 VLAN's;
and you can do a trunk link with all of them ...
On 7/4/07, Tom Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The documentation for the HWIC-4ESW
> (
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5853/products_data_sheet0900aecd8016b
> f0b.html) mentions dot1q trunk
hi,
several minutes ago we've just experienced the most awkward network
event: 6 catalyst switches ME-C3750-24TE configured as MPLS PE have
crushed at the same time.
we upgraded IOS version last week to 12.2(35)SE2. although it seems
like a clear IOS issue and we are standing by for update from C
The documentation for the HWIC-4ESW
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5853/products_data_sheet0900aecd8016b
f0b.html) mentions dot1q trunking as a supported feature, but doesnt seem to
hint at how many VLANs can be trunked, therefore, I'd be assuming that it
can do as many as is supported by y
Hi there...
Just looking for feedback on running PPPOE on a Ubr7246VXR CMTS router?
According to what I'm reading it supports PPPOE just like any other router
pretty much anyone using it and/or have any "gotchas" to share?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
___
Hi there...
Just looking for feedback on running PPPOE on a Ubr7246VXR CMTS router?
According to what I'm reading it supports PPPOE just like any other router
pretty much anyone using it and/or have any "gotchas" to share?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
You only need to create the SVI's if you need layer3 in place... if you just
want to trunk VLAN's between the two there's no need to use them
I would image you can do a LOT of VLAN's on them (don't know for sure but
guessing at 250) never done many as never had reason. But the nice
thing
Thanks for the fast reply!
What would I do if I need about 10 VLANs on my 4 port interface?
The router doesn't shout at me if I configure one of the ports of the
4ESW as a trunk. Should I do that and then create interface Vlan1,
Vlan2, ...? Is this a "good" solution, considering performance etc
Hi
I have a dhcp snooping setup on a 3550 switch.
I have downstream some other access devices that insert option82
information to the DHCP requests.
On my switch I have:
ip dhcp smart-relay
ip dhcp relay information option
ip dhcp relay information policy keep
!
ip dhcp snoop
Hi,
4ESW module knows 802.1q trunking.
BR//Dan
On 7/4/07, Paul Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> interface FastEthernet4
> switchport mode access
> switchport access vlan 10
>
> interface Vlan10
> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
> Create the VLAN in your VLAN database and that should do
interface FastEthernet4
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 10
interface Vlan10
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
Create the VLAN in your VLAN database and that should do the trick just
fine You need to use a SVI to make it layer3
I don't believe you can do trunking on the 4ESW bu
interface FastEthernet4
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 10
interface Vlan10
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
Create the VLAN in your VLAN database and that should do the trick just
fine You need to use a SVI to make it layer3
I don't believe you can do trunking on the 4ESW bu
Hello!
On my 7600 test box with RSP720 I failed to do egress netflow.
Here is config snapshot:
mls flow ip interface-full
interface GigabitEthernet1/25
ip address XXX.YYY.17.2 255.255.255.252
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/26
ip address XXX.YYY.16.2 255.255.255.2
Hi there!
Once again I have a small problem and I'm sure you guys can help me out ;-)
I have two 2821 routers. They have 2 Gi interfaces onboard.
In one of them I have a HWIC-4ESW.
I'd like to connect a Catalyst 2950 to a third interface of the router.
I need to configure the switchports (on the
A reboot isn't exactly a solution .. what ios are you running? Might be
worth lodging a bug on it.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sergey Velikanov
[Intelsoft]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2007 4:02 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subj
On Wed, July 4, 2007 10:24 am, Code Monkey wrote:
> Back in 2003 I failed miserably at configuring two 7206 VXR so that
> their FE interfaces could be connected to a VLAN switch, running MPLS
> in one VLAN and non-MPLS in other VLANs.
I've done this in a previous life, using the on-board ports on
Code Monkey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in 2003 I failed miserably at configuring two 7206 VXR so that
> their FE interfaces could be connected to a VLAN switch, running MPLS
> in one VLAN and non-MPLS in other VLANs.
>
> Basically I'd like to have
>
> int fa0/0.2
> description MPLS VLAN for my rout
oops forgot IOS version: c870-adventerprisek9-mz.124-11.T2
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
Back in 2003 I failed miserably at configuring two 7206 VXR so that
their FE interfaces could be connected to a VLAN switch, running MPLS
in one VLAN and non-MPLS in other VLANs.
Basically I'd like to have
int fa0/0.2
description MPLS VLAN for my routers
encapsulation dot1Q 2
ip addres
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a small router (c876) for a customer, with a VPN
setup such that VPN client get the default route thru the VPN, hence all
traffic goes thru the VPN (no split-tunneling). Along with NAT on the
"central" c876, it's not easy as it seems.
Basically, client VPN enter thru th
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 17:55 -0700, Kevin Graham wrote:
> Or more generally still, just NETCONF. Hopefully it
Isn't the CCE a netconf proxy in effect?
> will eventually kill the stupid templates we all have
> floating around in some form or another:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pro
Sergey Velikanov [Intelsoft] wrote:
> Hello
>
> Could anybody provide valid snmpv3 trap config?
>
> I've tryed
>
> snmp-server user trap_user trap_group v3
> snmp-server group trap_group v3 noauth notify *tv.0001..0F
> snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown lin
51 matches
Mail list logo
