If you have the dual AS BGP feature in your IOS verison you can easily
setup the two AS options.
otis
Kamlesh Sharma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Configuring two AS in cisco router is not possible. but yes it is very
> easily possible in Juniper Router's. I know i shouldn't be talking about it
> b
Yes you are right that would be 15 different routing instances but that
router does allow you to have routing in between these logical router so
ultimately we can have a router running two virtual router and having
coonectivity between them
thanks
On 7/20/07, Bruce Pinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kamlesh Sharma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Configuring two AS in cisco router is not possible. but yes it is very
> easily possible in Juniper Router's. I know i shouldn't be talking about it
> but yes by creating vertual router in Juniper box you can have u
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Kamlesh Sharma wrote:
> Configuring two AS in cisco router is not possible. but yes it is very
> easily possible in Juniper Router's. I know i shouldn't be talking about it
> but yes by creating vertual router in Juniper box you can have upto 15 AS
> no. on that.
You can use
Hi All,
Configuring two AS in cisco router is not possible. but yes it is very
easily possible in Juniper Router's. I know i shouldn't be talking about it
but yes by creating vertual router in Juniper box you can have upto 15 AS
no. on that.
--
Thanks
Kamlesh Sharma
_
Paste here...
debug vpdn
debug ppp
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fernando fernandes
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:56 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] cisco 2811 won't do ppp :(
lo there...
lo there... hoppe u guys can help me ..
i have an cisco 2811 with and wic-adsl, it sync okay in the dsl line
ive setuped the dialer so it can to the ppp
mas it just simply won't start :(
any ideas?
ff
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.ne
At 02:20 PM 7/19/2007 -0400, Chris Griffin wrote:
>Are we going to see eompls support on SVIs at some point on the
>Sup720 (PFC MPLS)?
There is a special case of EoMPLS being supported on an SVI for
Sup720 which is referred to as mux-uni.
http://www/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/products_conf
Kris,
In the below configuration, how are you allowing the incoming traffic? (from
outside to inside/internal)
Can you share your logs, when you try to initiate an access to the inside?
(output of 'show logging')
Regards,
Amol
PS: Hope the user/pass on the configs are not the actual ones!
O
Hi All,
Iam confguring remote site VPN on ASA 5510. Iam using Cisco VPN client. I can
able to connect the vpn successfully, after connecting i cant able to access
the lan on ASA side. the config is as like as follows,
sh run
: Saved
:
ASA Version 7.0(5)
!
hostname ASA
domain-name .xx
ena
Are we going to see eompls support on SVIs at some point on the Sup720
(PFC MPLS)? I have heard yes, but future code, and then no unless you
have SIP/SPAs.
Thanks!
Chris
Ian Cox wrote:
> At 11:02 AM 7/19/2007 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
>> 6500 Sup-II/MSFC2/PFC2 can't do SVI VRF forwarding?
>>
>>>
Your static translations don't look right, I would remove them and try
something like this:
static (inside,outside) tcp interface 7778 192.168.1.5 7778 netmask
255.255.255.255 0 0
Also your inbound ACL should read:
access-list INBOUND permit tcp any host 192.168.1.5 eq 7778
The real big quest
Hello Peter:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Nyamukusa
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 5:21 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] static Nat on Non Standard TCP port on PIX 506
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:02:46AM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
> 6500 Sup-II/MSFC2/PFC2 can't do SVI VRF forwarding?
>
> > UTC-6509(config)#interface Vlan801
> > UTC-6509(config-if)# description No Man's LAN ring 1
> > UTC-6509(config-if)# ip vrf forwarding no-mans-lan
> > %This interface does not sup
At 11:02 AM 7/19/2007 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
>6500 Sup-II/MSFC2/PFC2 can't do SVI VRF forwarding?
>
> > UTC-6509(config)#interface Vlan801
> > UTC-6509(config-if)# description No Man's LAN ring 1
> > UTC-6509(config-if)# ip vrf forwarding no-mans-lan
> > %This interface does not support ip vrf for
For a more robust system you might look into OpsWare, expensive but
covers a lot of things and plugs into Tivoli and Remedy. This is
obviously a large enterprise app and one might expect the costs and time
to be commensurate. We use rancid currently but we're looking at
OpsWare's Network Auto
6500 Sup-II/MSFC2/PFC2 can't do SVI VRF forwarding?
> UTC-6509(config)#interface Vlan801
> UTC-6509(config-if)# description No Man's LAN ring 1
> UTC-6509(config-if)# ip vrf forwarding no-mans-lan
> %This interface does not support ip vrf forwarding
Say it ain't so...? IOS c6sup22-jk2s-mz.121-2
For Windows: Kiwi Cat Tools
For Unix: Rancid
jms
ChrisSerafin wrote:
> Does anyone have a recommendation for vendor neutral configuration
> management software? I'm looking to alert on changes made to servers,
> firewalls, routers/switches, etc. Something that would poll the device
> for chan
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 09:41 -0500, ChrisSerafin wrote:
> Does anyone have a recommendation for vendor neutral configuration
> management software? I'm looking to alert on changes made to servers,
> firewalls, routers/switches, etc. Something that would poll the device
> for changes and alert wh
Does anyone have a recommendation for vendor neutral configuration
management software? I'm looking to alert on changes made to servers,
firewalls, routers/switches, etc. Something that would poll the device
for changes and alert when noticed.
Thanks,
Chris Serafin
Security Engineer
[EMAIL PR
This is mainly of interest to Australians working in Fed Gov't..
PIX/ASA version 7.0(6) has been listed on the DSD EPL as complete (EAL4+).
http://www.dsd.gov.au/infosec/evaluation_services/epl/network_security/cisco_secure_pix_firewall_v7.html
cheers,
Dale
__
Hi guys,
I am trying to allow external access to an oracle web server sitting on a
private IP behind a PIX 506
The public ip is 2.2.2.2 and the private IP of the server is 192.168.1.5 and
the application is running on port 7778
I am access the server from a source ip 10.1.1.2 but its not working
> I am trying to configure a cisco router, the 877w model. I have used the
> build in SDM to configure, and now i have added some NAT rules with the
> wizard, but i cant get them to work. Is there any way to solve my problem
?
You might consider posting the config or at least a vague idea of what
Hi :)
I am trying to configure a cisco router, the 877w model. I have used the
build in SDM to configure, and now i have added some NAT rules with the
wizard, but i cant get them to work. Is there any way to solve my problem ?
--
Sem Mais
Rui Oliveira
351 - Portugal
_
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Holemans Wim wrote:
> I also have a question about the fans : there is a command to show the
> fan status but what is the output if one of the fans fails ?
> Does it signal single fan failure or only full-fan failure ?
At least with the FAN1, all you
25 matches
Mail list logo
