What does "show mls qos" show? It is possible to have all the
mls qos configurations show up but then forget to globally enable it.
Rich
>Message: 8
>Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:29:00 -0400
>From: Matthew Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [c-nsp] VoIP QoS on Cisco 2950 series switches
>To: Ci
> Been looking around to try to find the best solution for a
> border router and
> it's looking like the best solution for the price is the 7206
> NPE-G2. I've
> seen the NPE cards go for about $11,000 each and before i
> make the purchase
> i wanted to see if anybody else had any recommenda
Been looking around to try to find the best solution for a border router and
it's looking like the best solution for the price is the 7206 NPE-G2. I've
seen the NPE cards go for about $11,000 each and before i make the purchase
i wanted to see if anybody else had any recommendations. Currently
Well, the CPU usage is high even without cable. I started generating CPU
graph and it shows the CPU usage is pretty high after inserting GEIP
controller in. I tried to get "sh stack" picture and according to stats
"Network Interrupt" is being called higher than others. Traffic is being
passed from
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 01:26:46AM +0500, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
> Thanks for your reply..I have not tried without cable, I will check it.
>
> Does cable effects even if the interface is shutdown?
For packet switching it shouldn't but if the driver is still sending
an interrupt it may.
> Why
Thanks for your reply..I have not tried without cable, I will check it.
Does cable effects even if the interface is shutdown?
Why I can't see the process taking this high cpu usage while I do show proc
cpu etcc.?
Here is the output for show diag, show stacks and show align
Router#show diag 5 (
What does 'sh diag' say and sh stack and show align.
It's as if interrupts are getting sent to the RSP for some
reason.
Does the same thing happen if no cables are attached.
'sh diag'?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:47:43AM +0500, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
> I have strange issue with 7507. I have a
I have strange issue with 7507. I have added a new GEIP controller into it.
By adding this GEIP controller the CPU usage has been increased up to 20%.
The strange thing is that CPU usage is always normal + 20% and there is no
traffic on this interface ( even if interface is shutdown the usage rema
Hello,
I have a Cisco 2950-LRE switch and I'm trying to enable QoS for
some VoIP traffic flowing across the switch. All interesting traffic
has DSCP set to EF. I followed some online docs (auto qos voip
trust) on the interfaces but it doesn't seem to be doing the trick
any ideas?
sh v
2007/7/25, Nate Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The URL
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
> is no longer valid.. anyone happen to have a mirror of this page?
>
> -nc
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-
Hi Bill,
if you use the loopback then its industry standard. By having it on an
internal software network its also not affected by network events that could
disrupt your BGP.
You'll need to reset the BGP session but its pretty straight forwards
Steve
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 09:16:26AM -0700,
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Gary Stanley wrote:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
>
> And the main page would be here:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/tools/quickreference/index.html
Thanks - doing a Google search wasn't helpful for me, but
Hi,
I have a question about my local router ID in BGP. We connect to our ISP
through eBGP and our local router ID has been a private address (192.168.x.x)
for years configured on VLAN 1 of our 7609. I was thinking about changing it
because most everyone I see has a public IP for the local ID.
All:
Could anyone explain the effect of the command "clear
memory low-water-mark" on 7600? Is there any similar
commands on GSR?
TIA
Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storag
At 12:21 PM 7/25/2007, Nate Carlson wrote:
>The URL
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
>
>
>is no longer valid.. anyone happen to have a mirror of this page?
>
>-nc
Try here:
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/router
The URL
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
is no longer valid.. anyone happen to have a mirror of this page?
-nc
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
Hi Eric,
Exactly.
As PE would forward Spanning tree BPDUs transparently, I am considering
STP is also an option to block a link.
For example:
CE1-A_(fa-1/1)--- PE1===PE2-CE2-A (STP ROOT)
| \ /
(fa-1/2) \
I also like to use "capture" on each interface in and out to see where
the issue is.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge
Evangelista
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:04 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM v2.3
Hi,
Do you indicate any reference for this topic?
I tried some books like "MPLS Configuration on Cisco IOS Software"
(pretty good book) by Lancy and Umesh, but it only touch the subject.
Tks,
Alaerte
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n
There was a "Cisco Highly Confidential" presentation leaked a few
months back. It was google-able.
That gave me the heads up on 6509-V-E/SUP720-10G/VSL technologies. Try
getting anyone at Cisco to tell you anything useful about it now
though.
I'm hoping Networkers might actually give some roadmap
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Bernd Ueberbacher wrote:
> Rodney Dunn wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:17:09AM +0200, Bernd Ueberbacher wrote:
> >
> >>Hi there!
> >>
> >>My L2TPv3 tunnel is currently running fine, but I have two short but
> >>stupid questions:
> >>
> >>Is it possi
Rodney Dunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:17:09AM +0200, Bernd Ueberbacher wrote:
>
>> Hi there!
>>
>> My L2TPv3 tunnel is currently running fine, but I have two short but
>> stupid questions:
>>
>> Is it possible to interfere the L2TP traffic with access-lists?
>>
>
> No. Not on the
You are filling up the rx ring and depelting the fifo buffers to the
chipset before the processor can service that rx_interrupt.
That's the most common cause of ignores on a software switching
platform.
What is th rx_ring depth in 'sh controllers'? I bet it's 64.
We've had to bump it up to 128 on
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:17:09AM +0200, Bernd Ueberbacher wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> My L2TPv3 tunnel is currently running fine, but I have two short but
> stupid questions:
>
> Is it possible to interfere the L2TP traffic with access-lists?
No. Not on the access side.
>
> I have to xconnect to
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Besides "that stuff is under NDA". Guess you'll have to speak to your
> SE about it. At least the replies confirmed I wasn't hallucinating
> during those presentations.. :)
Cisco also have a patent related to it:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20050063395.html
_
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007, Ian MacKinnon wrote:
> Oh I had heard something about this, and then could not find anything so
> thought I was making it up :-)
>
> Anybody got any public info?
Besides "that stuff is under NDA". Guess you'll have to speak to your
SE about it. At least the replies confirme
Oh I had heard something about this, and then could not find anything so
thought I was making it up :-)
Anybody got any public info?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> G'day,
>>
>> The 'enterprise' presentations from Cisco I occasionally attend have been
>> going on about a feature on the 6
Hi there!
My L2TPv3 tunnel is currently running fine, but I have two short but
stupid questions:
Is it possible to interfere the L2TP traffic with access-lists?
I have to xconnect to the LAN address of the router. On the LAN side I
just have a few /30 networks but nothing else. Should I pick o
Hi,
> G'day,
>
> The 'enterprise' presentations from Cisco I occasionally attend have been
> going on about a feature on the 6500 roadmap which pairs two 6500's
> together into one virtual router/switch.
>
> Does anyone have any links handy which documents the reality of this
> feature, or am I j
Hello c-nsp,
I have a c7401 running c7400-is-mz.124-13b.bin with "no ip pxf" acting
as an ADSL LNS showing high rate on one of it's interface of "input errors"
and "ignored". It comes in burst, not incrementing during one minute or so,
then during ~10 seconds, it increase of 20 to 1000 packets!
ov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> Thanks again Gianluca,
>
> By "traffic Locally switched" you mean traffic that does not cross bus
> (inbound and outbound interface on same module)
Yes, but in my case due to design and OSPF/MPLS, traffic that enter on
ten3/0/0 can exit on ten3/0/0 due to a fail
Thanks , This wont work in my case as the PPPOE/PPPOA client runs on dsl
modem , I managed to connect the 851 wan to the internal ethernet interface
on the dsl modem.
Anthor Question is that can we integreate 851 with Websense as url filter, I
did not see it on feature navaigator.
Thanks
Aman
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007, Saku Ytti wrote:
> > Does anyone have any links handy which documents the reality of this
> > feature, or am I just hallucinating during long sessions about 10GE copper
> > provisioning in (Western Australian) datacentres?
>
> Your best bet is to talk to your SE. I don't thi
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:49:31AM +0200, Bernd Ueberbacher wrote:
> I was just a bit scared about this "brute force" mechanism described in
> the forum post.
The release notes for the module should tell you which IOS trains support
it, and what subreleases you need.
Regarding the relations
34 matches
Mail list logo
